Forbes Loss is Our Gain: On Behalf Of Environmentalists, I Apologize For The Climate Scare

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Climate Change Hoax / Climate Alarmism
______________________________

The letter was originally published by Forbes Magazine but the truth will not uphold their climate deception so the site took the article down. People have already known about this hoax, now that knowledge is being substantiated by an insider. The UN's IPCC is a fraud. 

The IPCC does not take into account the sun and other factors correctly:

CLIMATE FORCING | Our Future is Cold

Yet the push for the Green New Deal like the Democrat Party released as their infrastructure proposal this week will harm the environmental and our economy in perpetuity.

"BIOFUELS, BIOMASS and WINDFARMS are destroying wildlife habitats at great speed, yet they do not produce any environmental benefits at all. They are remedies that are worse than the illness and should be abandoned immediately. 

If the planet is at risk, it is from the corrupt alliance of “green” charlatans, subsidy-sucking speculators, and politicians. Together, they have created a monster which is causing more devastation worldwide than there has been in 5,000 years of civilisation."

The World Council for Nature

So why is this Green New Deal thrown in the face of Americans and the world for the past four years? Money. Follow the money and see who is profiting off the deception. "Scientific institutions including WHO and IPCC have undermined their credibility through the repeated politicization of science. Their future existence and relevance depends on new leadership and serious reform." So from the same person comes his apology... and to buy his new book: Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All.

Here is an excerpt of his apology you can find the rest at Environmental Progress:

On behalf of environmentalists everywhere, I would like to formally apologize for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years. Climate change is happening. It’s just not the end of the world. It’s not even our most serious environmental problem. 

I may seem like a strange person to be saying all of this. I have been a climate activist for 20 years and an environmentalist for 30. 

But as an energy expert asked by Congress to provide objective expert testimony, and invited by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to serve as Expert Reviewer of its next Assessment Report, I feel an obligation to apologize for how badly we environmentalists have misled the public....

Here are some facts few people know:

-Humans are not causing a “sixth mass extinction” 

-The Amazon is not “the lungs of the world”

-Climate change is not making natural disasters worse

-Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003

-The amount of land we use for meat — humankind’s biggest use of land — has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska

-The build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more, and more dangerous, fires in Australia and California

-Carbon emissions are declining in most rich nations and have been declining in Britain, Germany, and France since the mid-1970s 

-Netherlands became rich not poor while adapting to life below sea level 

-We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter

-Habitat loss and the direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change

-Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels

-Preventing future pandemics requires more not less “industrial” agriculture

...I know that the above facts will sound like “climate denialism” to many people. But that just shows the power of climate alarmism... 

So move over Greta Thunberg, the truth of the matter is coming to light. Go back to school and learn real knowledge. Propaganda has ruined your life.

Or should more educated realists do what the LaRouche PAC did in October of 2019 to Democrat Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? They pulled off a real life theatrical production of Johnathon Swift's A Modest Proposal.

We need to eat the babies' says woman to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Brilliant. 

The best political stunt ever. 

It shows how much that environmentalism, climate change, and the depopulation agenda work together to deceive the public. These philosophies are farces that the public should ignore and stop funding. The organizations pushing this agenda should be investigated for fraud as well.

Are you ready to be free of the climate change hoax?


Source: Environmental Progress, Breitbart, Suspicious Observers, The World Council for Nature, All Thats Interesting,  

Learn about Space Weather with the SUN SERIES

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Science / Heliosphere
________________________________  

Since there are many questions about how weather and climate are created, here are a few videos to help mitigate the confusion: 

 The Sun Series  

Source: Suspicious Observers

Rain Dispersal, Elections, and GeoEngineering

Staff Writer, Nicole Meyer-Greene
Weather Modification / Elections
__________________________________

With elections for the City of Phoenix slated for tomorrow, Tuesday, August 25th, a curious situation happened: the rain was postponed. As weather forecasters predicted rain Monday night but mostly into early Tuesday morning and afternoon, all of a sudden, that prediction was put on hold.

Where did the rain go? 

After days of blue skies, the lines returned. Coincidence? 

And who is paying for these expensive toxic weather modification days? The City of Phoenix, which is already in financial debt? The State of Arizona, ditto? Or the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who have plenty of budgeted funds thanks to policy papers like PNAC, or it's new name the Foreign Policy Initiative? 

Tomorrow's Propositions are full of United Nation's funding for Climate Change policies that are destructive to Americans, the environment, and government budgets. 

One thing is certain: GeoEngineering is making a mess of our skies, ozone layer, and weather. 

Don't let GeoEngineering make a mess of Phoenix more than it already has.

Remember our If you don;t know, Vote: NO campaign. 

Fluctuations Dominate Climate, Not Trends

Staff Writer, Nicole Meyer-Greene
United Nations / The People
____________________________________

A 44 year veteran of meteorology and professor at University of Augsburger in Germany gave an interview about climate change, carbon taxes, carbon dioxide, and global warming people should take notice of. 

Klaus Hager told the Augsburger Zeitung that people around the world are being deceived. The 0.9C temperature rise since the mid 1990's can be accounted for by the new instrumentation introduced, not CO2. 

Human influence is very small. 

So why are we being forced into carbon taxes and a smaller carbon footprint? Ask who is benefiting from this con job. Who is getting paid? 

Then you will have your answer.

Source:  No Trick Zone

Solar Minimum Realities and the Failure of Politicized Science

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Global Warming / Mini Ice Age

___________________________________

Global Warming is all everyone talks about. Yet, there are some voices of reason that will no longer be silented by a political system that is not based on facts, science, or common sense.

Study: West Antarctic Glacier Melt Due To Volcanoes, Not Global Warming:

A BAS study from February found that Antarctica’s Pine Island glacier thinned just as fast 8,000 years ago as it has in recent times — it also was able to reverse the collapse.

Another BAS study from last year says western Antarctic thinning is within the “natural range of climate variability” of the last 300 years.

And if you disagree too much with the political wheel of Global Warming, you lose your station: Fired for ‘Diverging’ on Climate: Progressive Professor’s fellowship ‘terminated’ after WSJ OpEd calling global warming ‘unproved science.’  As if Global Warming was a science, it is more like magical thinking that requires pharmacological psychotropic intervention at the highest levels of international discourse.

Oh, yeah, there is no discussion. The debate is closed. It's Settled Science.

VDP Gazette takes every opportunity to correct the failings of our leaders in articles like: Why Global Warming Failed and the United Nations Should Be Dismantled and Trouble in Paradise; IPCC Approval Process Flawed. 

In the article, The Sun is Undergoing a State Change, James A. Marusek back in 2010 saw the writing on the wall.

There are Two Paths Ahead; Each Marked with a “Danger” Signpost. We are now at a crossroad. Two paths lie before us. Both are marked with a signpost that reads “Danger”! Down one path lies the threat from massive solar storms. Down the other path lies several decades of crushing cold temperatures and global famine.

If either of these threats materializes, many nations will be hit blind-sighted. Both are related to the current state of the sun. The sun has been in a “Grand Maxima” for most of the past century. This has accounted for much of the natural warming the earth has experienced. But as evident in the high number of spotless days in this solar minimum, the sun is changing states. It might (1) level off and revert to the old solar cycles or (2) the sun might go even quieter magnetically slipping into a “Dalton Minimum” or a solar Grand Minima such as the “Maunder Minimum”. It is still a little early to predict which way it will swing

The UN and Climate Alarmists have been shifting people's eyes away from the coming Grand Minimum of the Solar Cycle. The real danger lurks ahead but no one is paying attention. Cold kills more than heat.

At least if the Earth was warming, we would have more rain, more vegetation. As we slip closer to a colder temperature average across the planet, we are no longer able to have ample growing seasons or fruitful crops.

When science is politicized, this is what happens. No one is prepared. No one is planning for this colder climate. Instead we are paying for Light Rail, Infilling, Multiuse Housing, and Bike Lanes, which are bankrupting us. Tell me, how are those things going to feed humanity in the next decades when crop failures occur?

If we stop this destructive Climate Debate for Global Governance and start demanding action on scientific fact, we could minimize loss of life.

Shutting down power plants from coal to nuclear is irresponsible without viable replacements. Right now, there are no replacements because the government and United Nations hide free energy technologies for the good of corporations.

So who is really going to make billions of dollars off the suffering of us? What are you going to do about it? It's not a politician's responsibility. These people are bought by corporations that make money off your suffering.

In the USA the responsibility of governance is By the People. So yes, the coming unpreparedness and death are your responsibility. Or is that even more scarier than extinction?

Silence is no longer a choice:

There is a lot of talk these days about the legacy we will leave our children and our grandchildren. When I stare into the immediate future, I see a frightening legacy caked in darkness and famine. Instead of intelligently preparing; we find ourselves whittling away this precious time chasing fraudulent theories. We have a decade to prepare, but have a misguided sense of direction and urgency. In ten years from now when the next solar cycle begins; if the sun goes quiet, who will comfort the starving children who cry out in the middle of the night for a small piece of bread? These will be our children.

We have a decade to prepare. Are you?

Source: Bread and Butter Science, VDP Gazette GeoEngineering,

The EPA Needs Your Help to Fight the Lies of Climate Change

Staff Writer, DB Holmes
EPA / Carbon / Energy
______________________________

Here's a revised letter to the EPA that anyone can use and enter their vote on:

The EPA Needs Your Help to Fight Climate Change 

TO: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

I do NOT support the EPA's historic standards limiting industrial carbon pollution from existing power plants. Carbon is NOT a pollutant.

These new standards are not a vital step in the fight to protect our environment, save lives, and hold polluters accountable.

For these actions do not hold polluters of toxins and poisons to any set safety standard, it only creates a fake scarcity of resources that taxes families with higher energy costs, which is completely and totally unnecessary.

These new standards are the single biggest atrocity our nation has ever taken to combat the devastating effects of fake climate change.

Clean and safe air, drinking water, and food is a must, but eliminating energy availability that only profits a few is incomprehensible, irresponsible, and disgusting.

Please correct the erroneous assertion that Climate Change due to human activities exists. The shutdown of energy plants because of carbon emissions is a travesty and would leave millions without the power they need to survive harsh winters or hot summers.

Get involved and save Earth from the people who aren't interested in real pollution that plagues our planet. They are only interested in their pockets books and repeating the lies about carbon. The only pollution here is of the mind.

Source: League of Conservative Voters

Trouble in Paradise; IPCC Approval Process Flawed

Staff Writer, DB Holmes

United Nations / IPCC / Climate Change
________________________________

Harvard Professor on IPCC & Scientific Integrity

In his comments, Robert Stavins explains how the problems with the IPCC Working Group is structural, not personal. I would like to suggest that the IPCC has wasted the valuable time of Professor Robert Stavins of Harvard University. Member countries cannot come to an agreement where no problem exists.

One response to the blog post was:

In plain English this means that the IPCC contributors have no idea what the climate sensitivity is and that therefore that there is no credible basis for the WG 2 and 3 reports and that the Government policy makers have no empirical scientific basis for the UNFCCC process and for the politicians economically destructive climate and energy policies.
The entire UNFCCC – IPCC circus is a political exercise with no connection to the real climate.
Other forecasting methods are required in order to provide a basis for policy discussion. For forecasts of the probable coming cooling based on the natural 60 year and 1000 year quasi-periodicities in the temperature data and the use of the neutron count and 10Be record as the best proxy for solar “activity” see several posts over the last couple 0f years at
http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
It is really amazing that the WG2 and WG3 authors have been all working earnestly away on the basis of a future warming when it is more likely that the world will cool for the next 20 years and perhaps for hundreds of years beyond that. If we want to worry about extreme events the record of the Dansgaard – Oeschger events in the last glacial period and the 8200 year cooling event and the LIA in the Holocene should provide enough concern to keep the doom-lovers busy.

Another comment suggested:

You may or may not be aware that your post (which contains some excellent points) has already been seized upon by right-wing media, who are enthusiastically presenting it as evidence that the IPCC is fundamentally corrupt and that the underlying science they have worked to prepare is therefore somehow suspect. As someone who has followed the IPCC’s work closely for years, I consider this dangerously close to a distortion of your comments.

Sorry, potential Harvard student, but the VDP Gazette is not a right wing conspiracy news blog. We look for facts. Facts have led us here:

The IPCC is fundamentally corrupt. You cannot pressure people to change under the false assumption there is a problem without real proof. Climate is not based on computer models. Global Warming does not exist (at least in the way you were told). Climate Change is false also. Weather and climate are driven from solar and lunar patterns. 

Watch this lecture by Piers Corbyn about how climate and weather are created: The Reality of Long Range Weather and Climate Forecasting | EU2014. 

In this interview, Geoengineering Educator and Lecturer with Scott Stevens (a Meteorologist, minute 9:08), Mr. Stevens explains how geoengineering has been happening since the 1980's, just about the time Global Warming became a "problem." When in fact before a complete disruption of the global climate environment ensued, the Earth was headed into an ice age.

You are probably wondering why geoengineering was brought into this discussion? Easy. Let's use an analogy:

Say that I wanted to prove that all swimming pools, public and private, are human waste cesspools. The first thing that would happen is to test the water of a swimming pool, but before I did, I would urinate in that particular pool.

That is what geoengineering has done to the climate data en mass. Chemicals in the sky have warmed the environment by not allowing the cooling of night to exist. Without cooling during the night time hours, daytime heating is accentuated. Therefore, how can any temperature numbers be taken as scientific proof or fact of anything but climate manipulation? 

Besides the fact that Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is creating the Venus Effect on Earth, the lack of cooling at night by raising the albedo (reflectivity of the planet), this anomalous temperature range has sparked an increase of surface temperatures, trapped greenhouse gases within this shield, and has become a threat to global environmental stability, especially when solar activity is at its peak. As well as the fact that chemicals are destroying the ozone layer, killing plant life on the ground, and releasing methane from the depths of the sea, what possibly could go wrong? 

Geoengineering And The Collapse Of Earth

IPCC data corruption? Scientific theory corruption? Don't make me laugh. From the beginning the IPCC's numbers have been fudged, misrepresented, and distorted. 

Scientific inquiry? The IPCC is a politically motivated organization for the financial betterment of a few like Al Gore and his silent partner, Maurice Strong, when it came time to sell the world on erroneous Carbon Credits.

Wake up and smell the deception.

Does this make me smarter than a Harvard Student?


Source: Suspicious Observers, Robert Stavins Blog