Showing posts with label maurice strong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label maurice strong. Show all posts

Saturday, June 3, 2017

Movie Night: President Trump Withdrawals from the Paris Climate Accords... YES!

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Climate Change Hoax / Economic Slavery 
______________________________________



FULL President Trump announces withdrawal from Paris agreement

Remember Maurice Strong from the United Nations? His direct quotes, from Good Quotes, about the environment and humanity are thus:
After all, sustainability means running the global environment - Earth Inc. - like a corporation: with depreciation, amortization and maintenance accounts. In other words, keeping the asset whole, rather than undermining your natural capital. 
One of the things that I've always thought I would like to do is to develop an environmental index. Then people can measure their own environmental performance on an index as they do in other ways.

Licences to have babies incidentally is something that I got in trouble for some years ago for suggesting even in Canada that this might be necessary at some point, at least some restriction on the right to have a child.
Read more about the elite's plans and how mass murder is also considered: He Said, She Said: People say the Danmest Things

President Trump had the right idea by vacating this agreement. The question really is why did the former President Obama ever sign off on such treason? 

Globalists and United Nations are not our friends. 


Source: GOAT Video

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

The Overpopulation Myth, US Czars, and the United Nations' Hypocrisy

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Government / UN Propaganda
_____________________________________

What do you hear over Mainstream Media and the testimony of United Nations' "experts"? There are too many people!

Liars. 

Over two centuries ago, the Overpopulation myth began with an English preacher named Thomas Malthus, who expanded upon the idea of a Ventian monk:

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

 

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

 

Thomas MalthusMalthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

 

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

 

Thomas MalthusMalthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

 

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

 

Thomas MalthusMalthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

 

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

 

Thomas MalthusMalthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf
Click to Enlarge Images
Doesn't all this sound familiar? Starvation? Food crises? Disease? The two class system of Rich and Poor. Don't forget: Vaccinations!!!

From the United Nations' Maurice Strong:
Strong, who spearheaded the Earth Summit, has complained that "the United States is clearly the greatest risk to the world's ecological health," and wrote in an UNCED report in August 1991 that:

"It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class...involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, ownership of motor vehicles, small electric appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable... A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmental damaging consumption patterns."

Strong has forcefully advocated a new economic order based on the re-distribution of the developed world's industries and wealth to the Third World. Strong is indeed an arch antipodean socialist/capitalist.
to Bill Gates: 
Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, "First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent." (author’s emphasis).
 to Al Gore: "Gore: Reduce African Women’s Fertility to Limit Global Warming" and now government Czars are mimicking this murderous ideology: 

Science Czar John Holdren wrote the book "EcoScience" back in the 1970's, which is about strategies to remove humanity from this planet. As one reviewer on Amazon.com outlined the tenets of Holdren's theology as:
* Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;

* The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;

* Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;

* People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.

* A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.
All in the name of ecology.

The most recent eyeopener is the new Ebola Czar: Ron Klain.


Who are these people and where did they get their math? Overpopulation is not a concern. There is no concern except for elite snobs who want more for themselves by eliminating everyone else. It is that simple.

While First World Nations are being subjected to engineered market crashes, devaluing of their currencies, high unemployment, underemployment, wars, sustainability, vaccinations, poison food, water, and air, disease outbreaks, overuse of pesticides, and geoengineering, the United Nations cries: Social Justice!

How about murder? Can the United Nations cry that? 


What Mr. Gates admits to in this video should be enough to have him committed for psychiatric evaluation.

The United Nations has already infiltrated local government to push Agenda 21's Sustainability nonsense on Americans. Another Social Justice ploy to take away from hard working Americans to give to the lower classes what they have not achieved yet. In the end, there is no attaining a better life or lifestyle because it hurts the feelings of other people in poorer nations and neighborhoods.

What a crock.

My parents were the working poor. I worked my way through college so I could own a house and be a creative person. I achieved middle class status. Thanks to the bubbles and busts of real estate the banks and government regulators did on purpose someone who did not work for anything but a part-time job can live next to me paying half of what I paid for my home. 

That is not Social Justice. That is communitarianism: the community has more rights than the individual. Bollocks.

It is United Nations' logic of total hypocrisy. 

So the next time someone says the world is overpopulated maybe they should think on a few common sense points: 
Environmental activists who believe in myths and legends should probably have a psychological evaluation and be removed from any leadership positions until further notice.


Source: Got News, Scientific Slavery, The Corbett Report, AntiNewWolrdOrder,

Friday, October 24, 2014

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Not Another Conspiracy Theory: Agenda 21 is Real

Staff Writer, DB Holmes
Agenda 21 / Global Warming
____________________________________

The Honourable Ann Bressington exposes the hidden agenda of the Club of Rome, UN Agenda 21, population control and world government. She gives a frank assessment of what has happened up until now and suggests some solutions for averting our enslavement.

This video was recorded as an introduction for Lord Monckton's trip to South Australia February 2013. His presentation is called "Carbon tax, climate scam, Agenda 21: can democracy survive all three? Lord Monckton does due diligence".

You can find a summary of the content of this video at: http://defeatingnwo.blogspot.com.au/2...

Please visit me on the web:
defeatingnwo.blogspot.com.au
https://www.facebook.com/MelbourneFre...

Source: Youtube

Sunday, January 12, 2014

The Sun Flips Out, Geeks Get Excited, and Climate Change is Crushed

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Astrophysics / Weather
_____________________________________

Every eleven years the sun flips its magnetic field. To show how this happens, NASA has released a short visualization. This animation shows the green (positive) polarity switching with the purple (negative) polarity from 1997 to 2013.

“A reversal of the sun's magnetic field is, literally, a big event,” NASA’s Dr. Tony Phillips said in a statement issued on the space agency’s website.

“The sun's polar magnetic fields weaken, go to zero and then emerge again with the opposite polarity. This is a regular part of the solar cycle,” Stanford solar physicist Phil Scherrer explained.
The process has been slow and steady, with solar physicist Todd Hoeksama telling Metro: “It’s kind of like a tide coming in or going out. Each little wave brings a little more water in, and eventually you get to the full reversal.”

Scherrer explained earlier in December that “the sun's north pole has already changed sign, while the South Pole is racing to catch up.” 
There are far-reaching consequences to what happens with the sun:
“The domain of the sun's magnetic influence (also known as the 'heliosphere') extends billions of kilometers beyond Pluto. Changes to the field's polarity ripple all the way out to the Voyager probes, on the doorstep of interstellar space,” Phillips explained. 
As astrophysicists know, while real life data is kept out of the public sphere to prop up the Global Warming and Climate Change hoaxes, the sun is the catalyst for our climate and weather. For instance:
Solar Cycle 24 has been viewed as quite unpredictable. First, it came late by about a year, with extremely low activity recorded throughout 2009. This prompted astronomers to shift a predicted 2012 peak to 2013. Scientists say the cycle is already among the weakest reported and if the trend continues, the Earth might see another Little Ice Age. 
I have been discussing the Earth's return to a colder climate for decades, but the fear-mongering of a few cult leaders like Maurice Strong and Al Gore have all but pushed scientific facts out the window for the irresponsible Sustainability Movement from UNESCO and ICLEI. 

This article explains why: Creators of carbon credit scheme cashing in on it, always follow the money. Even the founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman with thirty thousand others, comprised of scientists and experts willing and able, want to sue Al Gore about the scam, as stated in the article: Global Warming Fraud.

So much for a consensus. 

John Coleman has even written: The Amazing Story Behind the Global Warming Scam, so check it out and get the real reasons why you have been lied to. 

In the meantime, when you go out in the afternoon and feel the warm rays of the sun, remember to blame the electromagnetic star when we reach 124 Fahrenheit in the summers, and not your car.

Unless we really do go into a mini Ice Age, then surely the Climate Change hoax will somehow be responsible instead of the reality of astrophysics. Wonder what name they'll give this weather fluctuation: Alien Invasion?



Friday, January 3, 2014

He Said; She Said... People Say the Damnest Things

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
News / Government
______________________________

Apparently someone is out to ruin Duck Dynasty. Phil Robertson's unconventional views were not enough to skew the conversation away from current events and government corruption so someone had to dig up an interview from 2009.

Would this be categorized as: Before They were Stars?

If you want to get mad about something said, perhaps you should get angry at the following statements:

David Rockefeller Admits "conspiring" in his 2002 Book entitled Memoirs:
cover of book of David Rockefeller's Memoirs"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
In 1973, David Rockefeller formed the Trilateral Commission (TC), about which Sen. Barry Goldwater in WITH NO APOLOGIES (1979) wrote: "In my view the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power---political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical." News With Views

The year after the Trilateral Commission was formed, Rhodes scholar Richard Gardner in the April 1974 edition of FOREIGN AFFAIRS (published by the Council on Foreign Relations, with David Rockefeller as chairman, 1970-1985) described how "an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault," and he went on to say how GATT would be part of that effort! News With Views
Leaders and role models (so-called anyway) carry on the mantra against humanity:
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."
If you think that is innocuous, then read the rest of the explanation:
In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for People) -- might be reduced. Natural News
Or how about these lies quoted from the UNFPA report by The Truth Wins?
*”The importance of the speed and magnitude of recent population growth in boosting future greenhouse-gas emissions is well recognized among scientists, including the authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s reports.”

*”Still, calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 per cent of emissions growth.”

*”Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendents. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time.”

*”No human is genuinely “carbon neutral,” especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way.”

*”Strong family planning programmes are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns.”
Next are they going to blame cows for flatulence? Oh, yeah they already did and then had to retract that false accusation made to control red meat consumption as stipulated by Maurice Strong: ( Liberty News Online)
In 1992, Strong told a UN conference...:“It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”
View the entire article here: http://americanpolicy.org/?p=7649.

Or, Maurice Strong's other comments quoted on Good Quotes:
We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse.

After all, sustainability means running the global environment - Earth Inc. - like a corporation: with depreciation, amortization and maintenance accounts. In other words, keeping the asset whole, rather than undermining your natural capital.

One of the things that I've always thought I would like to do is to develop an environmental index. Then people can measure their own environmental performance on an index as they do in other ways.

Licences to have babies incidentally is something that I got in trouble for some years ago for suggesting even in Canada that this might be necessary at some point, at least some restriction on the right to have a child.
What was that Mr. President?
“Ultimately, if you think about all the youth that everybody has mentioned here in Africa, if everybody is raising living standards to the point where everybody has got a car and everybody has got air conditioning, and everybody has got a big house, well, the planet will boil over — unless we find new ways of producing energy,” Obama said. The Blaze
You wonder why we have problems in the world? Perhaps we should be exercising our right to call people to the Hague for crimes against humanity. Least of all, we should be arresting people for treason in every country these people originate from.

Unless of course, you want to get a license to see your grandchild because their little lungs will expel CO2 and ruin the Earth. Then I wonder how these nutters are going to stop volcanoes from erupting? Are they going to carbon tax them too?

Of all the idiotic elitist statements found readily on the internet, the biggest crazy pants idea has to be the Georgia Guidestones:
  1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
  3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
  4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
  5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
  6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
  7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
  8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
  9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
  10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
What are the Georgia Guidestones? is the article on the Examiner. Erected in 1979, no one really knows who financed the project. If you read the inscription, in eight languages no less, the list sounds eerily familiar: global governance, sustainability, regionalism hidden in ideology... doesn't it?

It is not the fact that people and government / organizational reports are stating these fabrications. It is the fact that programs are being implemented to change society, destabilize global and national economies, cull and control the human population, weaponize weather, destroy national sovereignty, end individual property ownership, privatize and socialize every program that benefits the average person for dismantlement in the name of austerity, in addition to high taxes and corporate centralized power for monopolization and profiteering by an elite oligarchy.

It's time to grow up, discuss adult issues, and take the madmen out of power. Can we say: enough already?

Maybe that is what people should be mad at instead of a 67 year old duck hunter.


Sources: CNN