Villa de Paz Gazette: bill gates

Showing posts with label bill gates. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2020

The World Needs to End its Reliance on the Destructive Forces of Globalism, Communism, UN, WHO, CDC, and Bill Gates

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
UN / Bill Gates / Communist Chain
___________________________________

Mass immigration, open borders, disease outbreaks, and economic surrender, these are some of the enumerated negative impacts of Globalism.

In recent events, the world has seen the birth of COVID-19. Instead of dealing with the problem at hand, mainstream media beleaguered the racism card of social justice. Well there is a solution for that. Let's call the Chinese/Wuhan virus by its political affiliation. How does that sound?

America needs to take a leadership stand against the many voices that do not serve our greater purpose. The United Nations and the World Health Organization (WHO) have failed the world on a consistent basis with their social justice when the world needs a dose of reality and common sense.

If it were not for the United Nations, and other progressive/socialist/communist organizations around the world, civilized nations would not have to endure the open borders failures that allow migrants, who offer no positive input into the society, to invade and attack the very culture trying to assist these foreigners. Those migrants need to be removed and sent back to their countries of origin. Until people from other countries can respect their host country's culture and laws, then those people have no business asking for asylum, money, or refugee status. Your religion is no excuse for rape, murder, and drug trafficking.

Open borders is a failure.

Globalism is a failure. "We are the World" only works if people of the world are in charge of their localities, not faceless, nameless, unelected bureaucrats in foreign nations protected by armed guards. Because Globalism is a few standing on the necks of the many, just like communism, but in this instance, that communism is based on corporate power and structures acting like government.

You know it as fascism.

So when someone like Bill Gates, who would like to see carbon down to zero, which is advocating mass murder across the world, comes bearing gifts of corporate solutions, the people of the world should refuse his ideas.

Gates and people like him like to make others believe they are smarter and more capable than the rest of humanity, but in all their years have not once solved any issue beyond reproach.

No one has ever seen one of their (Globalist) solutions for the benefit of humanity just the profit of their stock portfolios.

Have you ever noticed that? We have the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that have made natural remedies and nutrition illegal to talk about in order to safeguard the profits of corporations like pharmaceutical, chemical, and vaccine companies.

The heads of industries have a revolving door of employment in United States agencies to protect their profits from actual scrutiny. That has got to end. Americans need to stand up to the White House and these agencies pushing profit over their health and safety.

Which brings us to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Who do you trust? The Communist Chinese Party (CCP) who have denied and lied about their outbreak to the point of making other countries unprepared for their own medical armageddon? Or, how about the United Nations and WHO, both of whom have covered for the Communist Chinese regime? Maybe you trust Bill Gates? He has never met a virus he didn't like because the solution (or so we are led to believe there is a solution) makes him, you guessed it: profit.

We should be demanding results, not solutions. Because the bad guys keep making the problems for us to react to and giving us solutions that never lead to the resolution of the original problem.

The world needs to demand accountability.

How can Americans step up where these Globalist leaders purposely fail us? We need American solutions to the issues at hand. Time to end globalism and our dependence on foreign nations.

America does not support communist nations except China. China is a world bully and world war initiator. The only way to put China down is to cut off its resources. China must abandon the Panama Canal, American ports, and other National Security threats it has become. China is a threat to other Asian nations, including international waters. China is taking over Africa because the soil there can feed China so Africans will slowly be pushed out from their homeland until their leaders wise up.

The other solution to the problem of Globalism is to pull out of the United Nations entirely. Each nation should go back to negotiating their own bilateral agreements. No more trade organizations. No economic blocks. So nations can regain their rights and freedoms again while safeguarding their economies and people.

Globalism is an attack on the people of the Earth. Every nation has been negatively affected by Globalist tenets.

This pandemic shows that Globalism is unsustainable as a policy. The creators knew it was a top 1% for the top 1% alliance from the get go. Each one of Globalism's proponents should be investigated for criminal activity including treason by every nation, independently.

COVID-19 should land the Communist Chinese leadership in front of the Hague. Not arguing a bioweapon as a lab experiment that got out willingly or unwillingly, but to argue the the CCP leadership knew of the extent and seriousness of the virus... and told no one. That makes the CCP culpable in using COVID-19 as a bioweapon on the world. To make matters worse for the CCP, these communists covered the problem up for political and economic gain against other countries crushed by the outbreak.

"Crisis" in Chinese is constructed using two different characters: Urgent and Opportunity: no good crisis should go to waste. Americans hear this turn of phrase from progressive politicians. Guess where these interlopers got the idea from?

World Coronavirus Count: 1,274,000 infected, 69,468 dead

USA: 336,830 (9,618 deaths), Italy: 129,000, Spain: 132,000

China owes the world reparations for the damage their leadership purposely caused the world so that the CCP would have no opposition to absorbing Taiwan, which the UN and WHO ignored during the outbreak in that country, and taking over the South China Sea.

The world has a huge Chinese Communist Party problem. Iran needs to realize their "friends" betrayed them and Russia needs to take a step back. China needs to be shunned politically, economically, and unapologetically.

It's time for the world to stand up to the Globalists and their solutions, which are not solutions at all. So no corporate testing or tracking of COVID-19 in the human population No giving up our rights to monopolies when we have the means to resolve this National Emergency with American ingenuity.

A solution has been sent to the White House on March 30th by our own editor, but will anyone listen because the solution is based in the Tenth Amendment and common sense results based testing versus Bill Gates' idea of power and control selling America out to corporations once again.

Which solution would you choose?

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

City of Phoenix Votes on Villa de Paz Recreation Center Illegal Sale and Development Plans

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Villa de Paz / City of Phoenix
_________________________________________

Again the residents of Villa de Paz are fighting against the illegal sale and development of land within its borders. This time the land is owned by the residents, which is being ignored for the dreams of development.

Villa de Paz is more than just one square mile:

A Place Like No Other

Villa de Paz is described as such. Not many places in the world can boast this exalted reputation. Villa de Paz is not like most other destinations on Earth for a few simple reasons: the residents, the wildlife, and the ambiance.

We are a Master Planned Golf Community that continues to battle against the overstepping of authority and boundaries of the City of Phoenix. In the last few years, Villa de Paz has battled against development on our Golf Course and now a new development with the Recreation Center.

A Home Owners Association (HOA) has claimed ownership and debt to a piece of history and land that this illegal organization does not own. The City of Phoenix continues to support and encourage the ramblings of an uncouth woman from Avondale over the prudent, researched, and educated information from its own residents.

A grander scheme plays but if development occurs, then there are no winners. The City of Phoenix will lose. When the golf course was threatened, 1700 letters flooded City Hall in revolt. As news spread about the sale of the Recreation Center, 700 letters opposed this action. 440 emails were sent, again in opposition. 11 out of the 15 HOA members refused to support the sale, development, and building on land that belongs to Villa de Paz residents, outright and legally.

This land has not and never will be owned by corporate interests, including a for profit organization, HOA, city, or individuals: in this case being [ ] White et al.

Yet the City of Phoenix continues to ignore crucial facts in order to energize a non-resident in her fiction of ownership.

These acts are folly.

Villa de Paz is not only a historical community within the borders of the City of Phoenix; Villa de Paz is a Sanctuary. Birds, fish, tortoises, reptiles, and humans cohabitate in this one square mile area. Our geography has created within itself a life sustaining symbiosis of creatures: plant and animal.

From Bald Eagles to unbanded Canadian Geese to endangered and greatest conservation needs species, a unique, balanced ecosystem has emerged. Even to tear one fraction of the whole away would create enough dysfunction to destabilize the entirety of the region.

Villa de Paz has become more than a Master Planned Golf Community; it has become a significant Natural Heritage site in Arizona where acts of Congress and treaties with other nations are brought to life.

If 12 homes are built on illegally obtain[ed] land, those responsible would violate the Migratory Bird Act of 1918, for starters. In accordance with the Act: “All guns, traps, nets, vessels, vehicles and other equipment used in pursuing, hunting, taking, trapping, ensnaring, capturing, killing, or any attempt on a migratory bird in violation of the Act with the intent to sell or barter, must be forfeited to the U.S. and may be seized and held pending prosecution of the violator. The property is to be disposed of and accounted for by the Secretary. § 707.” Large construction vehicles, loud noises, heavy commercial traffic, fumigation and pesticides, disruption of soil and the release of Valley Fever would qualify as destroying habitat, bird migration patterns, and bird reproduction as well as the killing of said species, young and old.

Instead of protecting the endangered and greatest conservation needs species that dwell within our borders, the City of Phoenix pursues violation of federal law. For what? Is it really sustainable to destroy a sanctuary to fulfill a quota? Or is that just immoral, irresponsible, and irrational?

The Mayor and City Council work for Phoenix residents, not Avondale residents. Why this illegitimate course is being pursued is beyond unreasonable. There will be no winners if the City of Phoenix abandons its responsibility to its residents in hopes to satisfy an outlandish fantasy.

I, like my fellow residents of Villa de Paz, am a Voter as well as Tax Payer.

Perhaps the Mayor and Council members should also calculate those facts in their equations when voting on this matter. Villa de Paz’s residents and our wildlife matter. We matter more than delusional people and destructive self interest.

A Place Like No Other exists as apart of our Arizona history, heritage, and culture, and a place like this one cannot be replaced by money.

The MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT 16 U.S.C. §§ 703-712, July 3, 1918, as amended 1936, 1960, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1978, 1986 and 1989.

If the City of Phoenix votes today and approves the killing and destruction of endangered and greatest conservation needs species, the Mayor and Council members will directly and indirectly violate federal law and an assortment of ongoing treaties with other nations.

If you are caught in the commission of a or many felonies, like selling land that is not legally yours to sell, taking off 40 year old stipulations for profit to residents in other cities, then you are also charged with felonies that are in direct and indirect correlation to the primary felony. such as setting habitat destruction and endangered species deaths, not to mention the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

So what crimes are the City of Phoenix's Mayor and City Council guilty of besides the obvious international, federal, state, and local ones?

Phoenix residents like the ones in Villa de Paz need to hold our elected officials to account. Illegal and unlawful acts are not why we elected people to serve us. It appears our elected officials do not believe they serve anyone else, but themselves.

It is time that unethical philosophy changes.

Call them today and voice your outrage against their actions:

Thank you.

Source: FWS, Endangered Species Act of 1973,

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

The Overpopulation Myth, US Czars, and the United Nations' Hypocrisy

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Government / UN Propaganda
_____________________________________

What do you hear over Mainstream Media and the testimony of United Nations' "experts"? There are too many people!

Liars.

Over two centuries ago, the Overpopulation myth began with an English preacher named Thomas Malthus, who expanded upon the idea of a Ventian monk:

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

Malthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

Malthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

Malthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf

There is nothing new in scaring the public into the idea of 'overpopulation' as the British Reverend Thomas Malthus was talking about it in the 1800's, highlighting the potential dangers of overpopulation in his propaganda piece Theory of Population, believing an increase in population would eventually outgrow the food supply, meaning that as humans keep breeding, a point would be reached where there is ‘not enough resources to go round,’ resulting in the starvation of the weakest in what he called a ‘Malthusian catastrophe.’

Malthus viewed overpopulation as the fountain of all misery and believed in depopulation by any means necessary. In his essay on the ‘Principle of Population’ he writes: ‘All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons... if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use...and court the return of the plague.’

Malthus was saying that if people were not willing to be starved to death, there were other forms of destruction, such as the spread of disease, which he also believed using vaccines and zoning programs against the poor was a good idea, segregating everyone from each other, especially the rich from the poor. These ideas were the foundations, or the beginnings of the self-preservation method for the ruling class, the systematic extermination of the lower classes. This is Eugenics; the poor and the lower members of the social scale were discouraged from having children, while the elite of society have as many as they like because all the rules they make up for the general public don't apply to them.

- See more at: http://scientificslavery.com/myth-of-overpopulation.html#sthash.puBgYwAD.dpuf

Click to Enlarge Images

Doesn't all this sound familiar? Starvation? Food crises? Disease? The two class system of Rich and Poor. Don't forget: Vaccinations!!!

From the United Nations' Maurice Strong:

Strong, who spearheaded the Earth Summit, has complained that "the United States is clearly the greatest risk to the world's ecological health," and wrote in an UNCED report in August 1991 that:

"It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class...involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, ownership of motor vehicles, small electric appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable... A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmental damaging consumption patterns."

Strong has forcefully advocated a new economic order based on the re-distribution of the developed world's industries and wealth to the Third World. Strong is indeed an arch antipodean socialist/capitalist.

to Bill Gates:

Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, "First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent." (author’s emphasis).

to Al Gore: "Gore: Reduce African Women’s Fertility to Limit Global Warming" and now government Czars are mimicking this murderous ideology:

Science Czar John Holdren wrote the book "EcoScience" back in the 1970's, which is about strategies to remove humanity from this planet. As one reviewer on Amazon.com outlined the tenets of Holdren's theology as:

* Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;

* The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;

* Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;

* People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.

* A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

All in the name of ecology.

The most recent eyeopener is the new Ebola Czar: Ron Klain.

Ebola Czar Ron Klain Says "Overpopulation" Top Concern

Who are these people and where did they get their math? Overpopulation is not a concern. There is no concern except for elite snobs who want more for themselves by eliminating everyone else. It is that simple.

While First World Nations are being subjected to engineered market crashes, devaluing of their currencies, high unemployment, underemployment, wars, sustainability, vaccinations, poison food, water, and air, disease outbreaks, overuse of pesticides, and geoengineering, the United Nations cries: Social Justice!

How about murder? Can the United Nations cry that?

Innovation to Zero Lecture

What Mr. Gates admits to in this video should be enough to have him committed for psychiatric evaluation.

The United Nations has already infiltrated local government to push Agenda 21's Sustainability nonsense on Americans. Another Social Justice ploy to take away from hard working Americans to give to the lower classes what they have not achieved yet. In the end, there is no attaining a better life or lifestyle because it hurts the feelings of other people in poorer nations and neighborhoods.

What a crock.

My parents were the working poor. I worked my way through college so I could own a house and be a creative person. I achieved middle class status. Thanks to the bubbles and busts of real estate the banks and government regulators did on purpose someone who did not work for anything but a part-time job can live next to me paying half of what I paid for my home.

That is not Social Justice. That is communitarianism: the community has more rights than the individual. Bollocks.

It is United Nations' logic of total hypocrisy.

So the next time someone says the world is overpopulated maybe they should think on a few common sense points:

Environmental activists who believe in myths and legends should probably have a psychological evaluation and be removed from any leadership positions until further notice.

Source: Got News, Scientific Slavery, The Corbett Report, AntiNewWolrdOrder,

Friday, January 3, 2014

He Said; She Said... People Say the Damnest Things

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

News / Government

______________________________

Apparently someone is out to ruin Duck Dynasty. Phil Robertson's unconventional views were not enough to skew the conversation away from current events and government corruption so someone had to dig up an interview from 2009.

Would this be categorized as: Before They were Stars?

If you want to get mad about something said, perhaps you should get angry at the following statements:

David Rockefeller Admits "conspiring" in his 2002 Book entitled Memoirs:

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

In 1973, David Rockefeller formed the Trilateral Commission (TC), about which Sen. Barry Goldwater in WITH NO APOLOGIES (1979) wrote: "In my view the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power---political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical." News With Views

The year after the Trilateral Commission was formed, Rhodes scholar Richard Gardner in the April 1974 edition of FOREIGN AFFAIRS (published by the Council on Foreign Relations, with David Rockefeller as chairman, 1970-1985) described how "an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault," and he went on to say how GATT would be part of that effort! News With Views

Leaders and role models (so-called anyway) carry on the mantra against humanity:

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

If you think that is innocuous, then read the rest of the explanation:

In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for People) -- might be reduced. Natural News

Or how about these lies quoted from the UNFPA report by The Truth Wins?

*”The importance of the speed and magnitude of recent population growth in boosting future greenhouse-gas emissions is well recognized among scientists, including the authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s reports.”

*”Still, calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 per cent of emissions growth.”

*”Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendents. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time.”

*”No human is genuinely “carbon neutral,” especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way.”

*”Strong family planning programmes are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns.”

Next are they going to blame cows for flatulence? Oh, yeah they already did and then had to retract that false accusation made to control red meat consumption as stipulated by Maurice Strong: ( Liberty News Online)

In 1992, Strong told a UN conference...:“It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”

View the entire article here: http://americanpolicy.org/?p=7649.

Or, Maurice Strong's other comments quoted on Good Quotes:

We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse.

After all, sustainability means running the global environment - Earth Inc. - like a corporation: with depreciation, amortization and maintenance accounts. In other words, keeping the asset whole, rather than undermining your natural capital.

One of the things that I've always thought I would like to do is to develop an environmental index. Then people can measure their own environmental performance on an index as they do in other ways.

Licences to have babies incidentally is something that I got in trouble for some years ago for suggesting even in Canada that this might be necessary at some point, at least some restriction on the right to have a child.

What was that Mr. President?

“Ultimately, if you think about all the youth that everybody has mentioned here in Africa, if everybody is raising living standards to the point where everybody has got a car and everybody has got air conditioning, and everybody has got a big house, well, the planet will boil over — unless we find new ways of producing energy,” Obama said. The Blaze

You wonder why we have problems in the world? Perhaps we should be exercising our right to call people to the Hague for crimes against humanity. Least of all, we should be arresting people for treason in every country these people originate from.

Unless of course, you want to get a license to see your grandchild because their little lungs will expel CO2 and ruin the Earth. Then I wonder how these nutters are going to stop volcanoes from erupting? Are they going to carbon tax them too?

Of all the idiotic elitist statements found readily on the internet, the biggest crazy pants idea has to be the Georgia Guidestones:

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

What are the Georgia Guidestones? is the article on the Examiner. Erected in 1979, no one really knows who financed the project. If you read the inscription, in eight languages no less, the list sounds eerily familiar: global governance, sustainability, regionalism hidden in ideology... doesn't it?

It is not the fact that people and government / organizational reports are stating these fabrications. It is the fact that programs are being implemented to change society, destabilize global and national economies, cull and control the human population, weaponize weather, destroy national sovereignty, end individual property ownership, privatize and socialize every program that benefits the average person for dismantlement in the name of austerity, in addition to high taxes and corporate centralized power for monopolization and profiteering by an elite oligarchy.

It's time to grow up, discuss adult issues, and take the madmen out of power. Can we say: enough already?

Maybe that is what people should be mad at instead of a 67 year old duck hunter.

Sources: CNN

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Common Core's Epic Fail

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Education / Community Interest

______________________________________

Common Core, it sounds like a new scifi movie or online game, but it is the structure of educational standards for students brought to a school near you by the federal government. Haven't we already learned from No Child Left Behind that the federal government has no business in the sphere of education? I guess not.

Thanks to the Gates Foundation, this epic fail was not only a way to control what students learn but to data mine their entire lives through Microsoft's Cloud system. The system would not stop at just intruding into a student's privacy but also that of their parents and other family members: "Data collected will not only include grades, test scores, name, date of birth and social security number, it will also include parents’ political affiliations, individual or familial mental or psychological problems, beliefs, religious practices and income." Information the government and the Gates Foundation have no business knowing for any reason, especially since the data will contain personal and behavioral profiles that may lead to abuse. There is no law to stop a school from selling student, family information. Nice.

It's a dangerous curriculum that begins programing our youth and to teach "young children to use emotionally charged language to manipulate others and teaches students how to become community organizers and experts of the U.N.’s agenda 21."

What? Children are supposed to be children not spokespersons for the United Nations or use Orwellian news speak. This standards set has gotten out of control. The educational system is supposed to teach and inspire, not train the next generation to be brainwashed, unquestioning automatons.

What makes this debacle even worse is that the standards are crap. Ethan Young stood up against Common Core Standards at his School Board Meeting:

TN Student Speaks Out about Common Core

Since states were given federal grants to implement this disaster, the questions become: should states accept any more grants or federal funding for our schools? Should states slowly become more independent from federal mandates?

The answers seem to be "no and yes."

If you haven't read Charolette Thomson Iserbyt's: The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, I would implore you do so. You can find the free online version of her book here.

Then you will begin to see how federal mandates and corporate interests like the Gates Foundation are not trying to educate anyone. To them, stupid people with the inability to critically think are the best people for the future because dumbed down people are easier to control and manipulate from their technocratic thrones.

Source: Ben Swann, Ben Swann, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America