Since his extraordinary 'awakening' in 1990 and 1991, David Icke has been on a journey across the world, and within himself, to find the Big answers to the Big questions: Who are we? Where are we? What are we doing here? Who really controls this world and how and why?
In this seven-hour presentation from May 2008 to 2,500 people at the Brixton Academy in London, David addresses all these questions and connects the dots between them to reveal a picture of life on earth that is truly beyond the cutting edge.
Nowhere in the world will you see a presentation like this one, which connects the apparently unconnected to form the tapestry of knowledge that can set us free from our collective enslavement by the hidden powers behind government, banking, business, media and all the other agencies of manipulation and control.
What is the connection between ancient history, 9/11, the 'war on terror', the gathering Orwellian nightmare and the nature of reality itself? It seems a strange question to most people, but in fact all are fundamentally linked, as Icke so compellingly reveals.
As he says: 'Without understanding the nature of our experienced reality and how we create it, we cannot truly understand anything else.'
Tens of millions around the world have become aware of David Icke and his work as what he has written in a stream of books has become our daily experience.
Now, go with him to the next stage of his incredible journey -- a journey Beyond the Cutting Edge.
When you listen to the excuses of the American government about 911, the apologists say: 911 was an intelligence failure. Some might agree. Some may not.
In this clip of Edward Snowden on NBC News, Americans discover that in fact the United States government had all the information it needed to stop the course of action that was 911:
Let's put that quote in slow motion, shall we?
"You know this is a key question that the 9/11 commission considered, and what they found in the postmortem when they looked at all the classified intelligence from all the different intelligence agencies, they found that we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community, as a classified sector, as the national defense of the United States, to detect this plot."
"We actually had records of the phone calls from the United States and out. The CIA knew who these guys were. The problem was not that we weren't collecting information, it wasn't that we didn't have enough dots, it wasn't that we didn't have a haystack, it was that we did not understand the haystack that we had."
Then why does the American government keep using the intelligence failure repeat? Are government officials admitting that their surveillance state failed in the eyes of history? Or are officials placing the blame on something, someone else?
Meet Susan Lindauer. A CIA Asset and go between for U.S.-Iraqi relations. Here is her testimony:
The fact is the United States government has been illegally and unconstitutionally stealing Americans information, data, metadata for over a decade. The American government had several chances to stop the 911 attacks and did not do so.
Why would a government do such a heinous act against its people and the world?
Haliburton Oil's central Asian pipeline was finished (except for its Afghani segment) by last March, at which time Bush began sending U.S. troops to countries bordering Afghanistan. Haliburton Oil (Vice President Cheney's former company) and the Carlyle Group (which occasionally employs both Presidents Bush) would have benefited greatly from an oil pipeline across Afghanistan.
to:
Counter-terrorism and Intelligence expert Richard Clarke, the former US
diplomat, recently revealed that the CIA contacted the 9/11 hijackers to
recruit them before the attack. (See David Dayen’s FDL Roundup for Aug.
11 & links below.) In the days following the 9/11 attacks, Osama
bin Laden released videos denying involvement in the attacks, but did
say he that Allah was punishing the US. This was the beginning of his
television propaganda career.
* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.
then:
Which brings us back to the War on Terror. Aaron Russo, a flimmaker and
who has since passed from cancer, was befriended by Nicholas Rockefeller
for a time. Mr. Russo remembered being told many horrible details from
this member of the elite, some of which was:
Nick Rockefeller told Russo about the plan to microchip the population,
warned him about 'an event that would allow us to invade Afghanistan and
Iraq' some eleven months before 9/11 and foretold the fact that the
'War on Terror' would be a hoax wherein soldiers would be looking in
caves for non-existent enemies.
It's order out of chaos... a new world order. First a government creates a problem, waits for the public outcry, and gives the public the solution the government always wanted to give: servitude of the people. Rights are now privileges.
See how easy that was?
Surveillance and a police state aren't the answers to any problems except for how the ruling elite can keep on ruling without the rejection from the public. Keep the public dumbed down. Make sure the public always is a state of fear, or in the case of Hollywood: pleasure and entertainment. Offer the solution to the public for a government-made problem.
Before the public figures out the police state is not a conspiracy theory but a goal, have the gates locked with guards posted so the elite ruling class is safe to rule as overt dictators.
Abby Martin on the newest revelations from WikiLeaks that all Afghanistan’s phone calls are recorded by the NSA. Uruguay’s President Jose Mujica’s decision to give up his presidential mansion to 100 Syrian refugee children, accept Guantanamo Bay detainees into the country and reject the war on drugs. Eugene Puryear of the ANSWER Coalition talks about Boko Haram terrorist attacks and the wisdom of sending in a US military force to track down the kidnapped girls. Viewers called on to take part in the March Against Monsanto. Finally, RT’s Sam Sacks on the House of Representative’s decision to strip out an amendment to the Defense budget that would have repealed the Authorization for Use of Military Force, which is the justification for nearly all the actions taken during the War on Terror.
Government / Surveillance
______________________________________
Have you commented on an article or been on a forum discussing topics with fellow Americans? All of a sudden someone(s) come onto the scene making it difficult for you and others to communicate? Does this person(s) appear to be pro-government and anti everything that you see for yourself?
You're not alone.
Americans and other people from around the world are in a struggle against what are termed: Paid Shills. These people are real. They really go onto the internet to disrupt conversations in order to keep people from realizing any type of truths that may shed light on dark governmental activities.
Yes, people will say: that's a conspiracy theory, but it isn't even if this accidental copy and paste wasn't published on the forum GodLikeProductions:
Re: Medical Type Says Sandy Hook is Total Bull#
[0x1a970000, 0x1ab00000, 0x27570000>
[rdpclip.exe, "iostatZd15.1"]
you copied a large amount of data onto the clipboard …Do you want to save this data on the clipboard?
User ID: 35850666 Korea
User ID: 36689081 Korea
User ID: 33951304 Kazak
User ID: 36809983 Kazak
N.C.S. logo.jpg
//SECRET
C:\SharePoint012USNCSauthassetsSAD_Wrkc9inet-N-7339.tx?t
**********************************
REMINDERS —— NOTES
**********************************
Sensitivity Level
Action Code
Team 5.A/
SITE
Location of official Agency folder
None NPRC
Team Contact
Sheila N******
Do any of the respondents display the urge to supply information that could be helpful to your mission?
Do the respondents appear hostile to your attempts to steer the discussion?
Have you made a personal chart taking care to note who appear to be the “leaders” versus who appear to be the “followers”?
Have you attempted to gauge the “temperature” of the forum’s users?
In other words, the prevailing social psychology of the forum’s members?
Have you been more successful with one or the other XStart methods that were demonstrated in N-7015A.DOC?
Have more technical members (Computer Programmers, Administrators, or Moderators) of the forum deduced or accused you of hiding behind a proxy?
Would you gain more trust and/or credibility if you were to use one of the Agency’s allotted “HOME” pools? (most often needed when handling EVTS that are more sensitive to the pop. of a specific locale but also location centered web sites such as FB or Patch)
Has your PREDEV “persona” been successful or do you gauge that the users find you to be too obtrusive? Accusations of being “ever present” are
The post was truncated from there.
This example shows how one person can be four different people on a forum. The person's IP address is masked as different codes.
At one time the government was not allowed to propagandize the American people, but that has changed. With the advent of the NDAA now the U.S. public is at the heart of the information war. Disrupt, discredit, and disinformation are the goals:
Still, not everyone is completely comfortable with the changes. Tim Cushing of TechDirt.com noted his discomfort saying, “The fact that the State Department is behind the effort doesn’t do much to allay fears that the BBG will become a tool of domestic propaganda.”
On the other hand, Cushing also points out that the progressive media is already a mouthpiece for the government all too often. Cushing ruefully says that the media “haven’t shown much reluctance to regurgitate talking points, which almost makes the BBG’s efforts seem redundant.”
When a government owns the mass media, the old laws need to be replaced with new ones.
The Smith-Mundt Act, adopted in 1948, explicitly forbids information and psychological operations aimed at the US public. Nevertheless, the current easy access to news and information from around the globe, mades it difficult to guarantee PSYOP programs do not reach the US public. Or, in the words of Army Col. James A. Treadwell, who commanded the U.S. military psyops unit in Iraq in 2003, in the Washington Post: There's always going to be a certain amount of bleed-over with the global information environment
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (NDAA) allows for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be released within U.S. borders and struck-down the Smith-Mundt Act which banned on the dissemination of such material in the country. So as recently as LAST YEAR, more than 10 years after the beginning on the so-called "war on terrorism" the US Congress deliberately included in the NDAA, a provision allowing the government to propagandize the American people. Congress knew this component was in the Bill and Congress deliberately acted in a manner to use government resources to influence political opinion inside the country. Put simply, elected officials using government money to make sure they look good in the media. A complete and deliberate defrauding of the taxpayers by our own elected officials.
It seems the War on Terror is a war on the American psyche.
“While the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 was developed to counter communism during the Cold War, it is outdated for the conflicts of today,” Rep. [Adam] Smith says in his official statement. “Effective strategic communication and public diplomacy should be front-and-center as we work to roll back al-Qaeda’s and other violent extremists’ influence among disaffected populations.An essential part of our efforts must be a coordinated, comprehensive, adequately resourced plan to counter their radical messages and undermine their recruitment abilities. To do this, Smith-Mundt must be updated to bolster our strategic communications and public diplomacy capacity on all fronts and mediums – especially online.”
Doesn't seem as if the Congressman has been on the internet of late. The CIA is not interested in facts, figures, or diplomacy. The CIA wants to discourage free thought and the use of facts, figures, and reality. It's propoganda plain and simple.
Americans receive the government's talking points on the television news, online media, and now this propoganda is being directed straight at the People.
If you want to see government shills in action, go to a website that speaks the truth like Skyder Alert. Even with irrefutable photographic evidence of geoengineering in Phoenix, AZ, someone had the audacity to tell this editor those pictures weren't the droids you're looking for.
Trolls. Shills. Paid operatives.
The next time you are online and disagree with the official stance of the United States, you too may be talking to an undercover CIA agent.
Welcome to the new Soviet AmeriKa. [cue Twilight Zone music]
Can someone tell the truth too much? What happens when you connect the dots in a criminal conspiracy for profit and control? And, tells everyone about his research? Meet Splitting the Sky.
Dacajeweiah "Splitting the Sky" aka John Boncore and John Hill is a member of the Mohawk Nation. In his own words, Splitting the Sky wrote:
Dacajeweiah "Splitting the Sky" aka John Boncore and John Hill, a Mohawk, a principal leader of the Attica rebellion, a leader within the American Indian Movement with the League of Indigenous Sovereign Nations, in particular at Gustafen Lake BC, and a 9/11 Truth researcher, advocate and speaker. Also a part time film and screen actor, as well as a carpenter.
Splitting the Sky was born January 7th, 1952 and died under mysterious circumstances March 13th, 2013. Nearly a year after his death, many questions remain.
One of his friends who has since taken over his blog had this to say about the investigation into Splitting the Sky's death:
I want to emphasize something which I touched on in the previous post, that the BC Government and the RCMP should be considered as being in a "conflict of interest" with regard to their "investigation" into the death of the high-profile, life-long activist Splitting the Sky. The Government of BC and their friends want to put an oil pipeline through B.C., across First Nations territories, and he opposed that. As to the RCMP, they may hold a grudge as he exposed their corruption and dirty tricks in the wake of the Gustafsen Lake Stand-Off in 1995, and law enforcement officials generally, both in Canada and the USA may still consider him a "cop killer" dating back to the "Attica Rebellion" in 1971 (although he was exonerated), and also for later exposing the brutal murders committed by NY State troops when they violently put down the rebellion, for which no one was ever held accountable.
Splitting the Sky often took on new controversies with the same heart and soul he had during his earlier turmoils. He discovered how powerful words could be. He found his voice and called out for justice.
Life-long activist, Splitting the Sky appeared at St. Ann's Academy on November 29, 2008. In this impassioned and authoritative speech he meticulously follows the bloody and labyrinthine trail of corruption and money, which leads him to conclude that a cast of top-level financiers and international secret service agencies were behind the events of 9/11...
...After a childhood in foster homes and juvenile jails, Splitting-the-Sky became a teenage organizer in Attica prison -- and the only person convicted for the 1971 Attica revolt. After barely escaping the electric chair (the attempt to scapegoat him foundered on the obvious fact the most and worst atrocities were committed by the authorities, not the prisoners) Splitting-the-Sky went on to become one of the greatest Native American activists of his generation.
During his stay at the Marriot Hotel one block from the World Trade Center in September, 2001, Splitting-the-Sky had an intuition that he had better cut short his vacation and leave -- so he checked out and left New York one day before the attack. Later, he grew suspicious and began the research that convinced him 9/11 was an inside job. By the time I met him in 2007, he had become an expert on the "money trail" linking the New World Order banksters to 9/11.
9/11 was Splitting the Sky's crowning achievement. He researched through countless websites and articles as he followed the money. In his heart, he knew what happened on the day that changed America forever. What he found, he shared with anyone who would listen.
Isn't it time you listened? You will not be disappointed.
“We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these
acts and those who harbor them.” — George W. Bush, 9/20/01
Are you sure about that, Mr. President? Because the rooster has come home to roost. The true origins of the supposed world terrorist threat is making itself known.
The Saudi Prince, whose nickname is Bandar Bush because of his close ties to the Bush family, has been admitting he has control of terror cells and armies.
"As mentioned, Saudi Prince Bandar Bin Sultan has recently visited the
Russian capital Moscow to carry out talks with the Russian President
Vladimir Putin in terms of Syria. The report states that the Saudi
Prince Bandar Bin Sultan has negotiated with Vladimir Putin in “his
capacity as the Prince of the Mujahedeen” in Syria and this also
includes the jihadists and Islamists from Dagestan, Chechnya, and the Caucasus in Russia’s backyard."
Point of fact, the Prince's role is of a terrorist leader. In the last week, terrorist attacks have been happening again in Russia only months before the Sochi Olympic Games.
As CBS News reported:
The first bomb went off in Volgograd's main railway station. A security camera caught the moment of the explosion. Witnesses say it was a suicide attack.
Then - less than 24 hours later - another bomb blew up a Volgograd bus. No one has yet claimed responsibility but Chechen rebels are the main suspects.
Why? You may ask. President Putin made it clear to Bandar bin Sultan that Russia would not play against Syria and its people. Their reported exchange is said to have been:
Prince Bandar said: “I give you the guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. Chechen groups, which threaten the security of the games, are controlled by us, and they do nothing without consulting us.”
Putin responded by saying: “We know that you support the Chechen terrorist for decades. And the support, of which you just spoke openly, is completely incompatible with the common goal of fighting global terrorism. We are interested to develop friendly relations after clear and strong principles.”
“Our point in terms of Assad will never change. We believe the Syrian government is the best representative of the Syrian people and not these liver-eaters.”
Of course Putin is referring to the Syrian terrorists who have been photographed tearing out and eating the heart and liver of a Syrian soldier.
With a little research, a clear connection between terrorism and Saudi Arabia can be established. What was that quote again from President Bush?
“And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism.
Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are
with us or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any
nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by
the United States as a hostile regime.” — George W. Bush, 9/20/01
A break in the case finally came about two weeks ago when suing Saudi Arabia was approved by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the interest of justice.
Families of the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks today celebrated a federal court's ruling that allows relatives of people who died in the 9/11 terror attacks to sue Saudi Arabia.
Most of the hijackers who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001 were from Saudi Arabia, and the complaint states that much of the funding for the al-Qaeda terrorists came from Saudi Arabia.
An attempt to Saudi Arabia in 2002 was blocked by a federal court ruling that said the kingdom had sovereign immunity. That ruling was reversed Thursday by a three-judge federal panel.
It seems the U.S. government does everything in its power to protect the Saudis. Instead of letting a court case play out a decade ago, the government interferes and interferes. Why would the American government not want to see justice prevail?
Sherwood Ross, an award-winning journalist who has worked for the City News Bureau of Chicago, the Chicago Daily News, and for Reuters and other wire services, told me in a recent radio interview:
“It’s very doubtful that Muslims were behind 9/11. Think about this for one minute: That President Bush’s family had done business with the family of the man who allegedly made the terrorist attack, Osama Bin Laden. The Bin Laden family was actually on the board of Bush’s oil company. How is it possible that of all the billions of families in the world, the one family that makes the attack on America has done business with the President of America.
That sounds more like a favor than anything else. I don’t think 9/11 was an Arab conspiracy or a Muslim conspiracy. I think it’s an American conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States and install what is becoming a police state, and also to advance the imperial ambitions of the United States, to swindle the Middle East out of their energy resources.”
So was 9/11 an attack or a favor from Bandar Bush, the bin Laden family, and the rest of the Saudi Arabian dictatorship in order to invade sovereign Middle Eastern countries to create instability and profit for a few at the top?
To discover the truth, then the oil pipeline in the Middle East must be discussed. Was there a financial gain for President Bush and his administration to go into sovereign countries under the guise of terrorism?
A letter to the Editor from Wes Wilder from Tuscaloosa sums the answer up:
Haliburton Oil's central Asian pipeline was finished (except for its Afghani segment) by last March, at which time Bush began sending U.S. troops to countries bordering Afghanistan. Haliburton Oil (Vice President Cheney's former company) and the Carlyle Group (which occasionally employs both Presidents Bush) would have benefited greatly from an oil pipeline across Afghanistan.
By July a sizable number of American troops were in place around Afghanistan, and Bush offered the Taliban "a carpet of bombs or a carpet of gold" in order to obtain a right-of-way for the pipeline. As an act of good faith, Bush then issued document number 199i WF213589, which ordered the FBI and other governmental agencies to drop investigations into the bin Ladens, the Taliban and al Qeada. Agents were ordered to stop their investigations or face punishment. By last July Bush had already given the Taliban about $143 million of U.S. taxpayer money to show he was serious about his oil deal. The attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 were the result of a Bush/Cheney oil deal gone bad. Since Bush chose the interests of the oil companies over the interests of the American consumer before, there is no reason to believe he was conducting negotiations with the Taliban for our benefit. No, this is a case of George W. Bush using the power of his office for personal financial gain.
What was the intelligence community doing during all this? One woman, a CIA asset, was arrested for telling truth to power. Her name is Susan Lindauer.
In her book, Extreme Prejudice, she uses over 500 citations to make her case. She was imprisoned under the Patriot Act for trying to stop the Iraq War and later going through proper channels to testify before Congress.
For more information, please watch her presentations and lectures on Youtube including: Patriot Act Fascism below. (You'll want to take the time to watch it. Very informative.)
If you do not know about the Patriot Act or the indefinite detention clause of the NDAA, then you need to watch the videoes with Susan Lindauer to get an understanding of why these laws are unconstitutional and dangerous beyond the scope of what is reasonable.
There are other far reaching consequences to silencing people. Checks and balances disappear. The Bush Administration wanted to attack the Middle East. Nothing and no one was going to stand in the way.
Counter-terrorism and Intelligence expert Richard Clarke, the former US diplomat, recently revealed that the CIA contacted the 9/11 hijackers to recruit them before the attack. (See David Dayen’s FDL Roundup for Aug. 11 & links below.) In the days following the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden released videos denying involvement in the attacks, but did say he that Allah was punishing the US. This was the beginning of his television propaganda career.
Apparently still working as an Intelligence Asset, bin Laden then started releasing videos aimed at aiding the electoral hopes of his brother’s business associate. The long-running series’ most famous episode was the “October Surprise” video, released a few days before Election Day 2004 – the day former bin Laden associate G.W. Bush stood for reelection. The video brought a late rush of voters and monetary support to Bush, who won the controversial election.
In addition, General Wesley Clark has also admitted in an interview that "Five Countries in Seven Years" was the goal of the United States government all along: Gen. Wesley Clark, Democracy Now! interview, 2007.
Why wasn't a connection made public earlier? You can thank the mainstream media for doing the bidding of the government. The elite-controlled American media has done everything to insulate the Bush family, bin Ladens, and other top ranking officials from questions, answers, and responsibility.
* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.
The two central tenets therein are "for
American forces to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous
major theater wars," and to "perform the 'constabulary' duties
associated with shaping the security environment in critical
regions."
The PNAC Statement of Principles is signed by Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, as well as by Eliot Abrams, Jeb Bush, Bush's special envoy to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad, and many others. William Kristol, famed conservative writer for the Weekly Standard, is also a co-founder of the group. The Weekly Standard is owned by Ruppert Murdoch, who also owns international media giant Fox News.
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event; like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions. A decision to suspend or terminate aircraft carrier production, as recommended by this report and as justified by the clear direction of military technology, will cause great upheaval.
What was that quote from President George W. Bush again? Does it matter? A new Pearl Harbor had been commenced. The fate of the world has been forever changed for the corrupt and diabolic group think of a few individuals in the true axis of evil for global domination.
In the article entitled: The Project for the New American Century, Willam Rivers Pitt analyzes the entire PNAC document. It is a must read. The paper connects so many of the dots that are ignored by mainstream media that the facts are hard to dismiss. When you read it in its entirety, you will know why the American people have been left in the dark.
This journalistic treatise not only points the finger at the Bush family and top republicans but also points at the democrats. Our leaders from both sides of the political spectrum are involved with this conspiracy to defraud, defame, and destroy America.
Let the reader be reminded, that this document we are quoting, which can be readily viewed at PNAC's website, (Rebuilding America's Defenses), was drafted in 1998, based on a document that was presented to the White House in 1992!
1992 - 1998 would be the end of President George H.W. Bush's term and straight into President William Jefferson Clinton's Administration. Are you upset yet? This information is but the tip of the iceberg. When people dig further, the whole dynamic of (the government behind) the government's purpose is revealed.
Under President Barack Obama little has differed in course from the PNAC agenda. For someone whose political platform was about change, the American people have seen George W. Bush's terms number three and four instead. President Obama also signed the NDAA, section 1021 (indefinite detention) into law in 2012. Not the change the people voted for.
Why is that? The same people who have been in charge behind the scenes are still in charge. No matter who is voted in, the power elite controls what does and does not happen in the world.
Hillary Clinton and Chris Christie, or whoever the next presidential contenders will be, are not going to change that fact. Why would they want to? An elitist, no matter their stripes, is still an elitist.
If you want to know more, then read anything from Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Republican as well as Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, and now is President Barack Obama's foreign policy advisor. The Post-American World from Fareed Zakaria, a Bilderberg insider, is an eye-opener. Read the white papers from the Council on Foreign Relations, OECD, Trilateral Commission, books by Bilderberg group members, and any think tank supported by Carnegie, Rockefeller, Carlyle Group, or Ivy League University.
These power elites think up something and the rest of the world pays the price for it. Over and over again their made up problems for the people to react to so that the elite's solution can be implemented is duplicated and repeated. The relentless rituals to do wrong against the world never ceases to destroy.
“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
Exactly, President G.W. Bush, it is Ordo ab Chao. We are living the nightmare of the imperialistic philosophy: Order out of Chaos. The elite are drunk with absolute corrupt power and out of control on an unprecedented level.
Which brings us back to the War on Terror. Aaron Russo, a flimmaker and who has since passed from cancer, was befriended by Nicholas Rockefeller for a time. Mr. Russo remembered being told many horrible details from this member of the elite, some of which was:
Nick Rockefeller told Russo about the plan to microchip the population, warned him about 'an event that would allow us to invade Afghanistan and Iraq' some eleven months before 9/11 and foretold the fact that the 'War on Terror' would be a hoax wherein soldiers would be looking in caves for non-existent enemies.
With all this evidence coming to the forefront, how can any American not demand that these elites be arrested and tried for treason, war crimes, and crimes against humanity? Who is going to do it? The Justice Department?
Remember who you vote for is the same person you would not vote for in any election because the elites own the political process. So how is this juggernaut going to be blocked from advancement?
There is a conspiracy going on in the world. People pointing out the connections are not crazy; they simply see what others do not want uncovered. The time has come when the truth can no longer be stifled by mainstream media, politicians, or despots. The time for people to speak truth to power has come. The truth has become the counterbalance campaign against the destruction of humanity.
Truths like the Bush family is associated with the bin Ladens and Bandar bin Sultan (Bandar Bush, the "Prince of the Mujahedeen") as well as George H.W. Bush's CIA connections and his family's corporate relationships that have become but one chapter in the elite's handbook.
The rest of the elite's macabre manual uses think tanks, experts, The Project for a New American Century, CFR, OECD, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg; rebels, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nursa, terrorism, "War on Terror", Arab Spring; global warming, climate change, international law, sustainability, multiculturalism, racism, political correctness, communitarianism, consensus, the United Nations; population control, GMO's, pharmaceuticals, fluoride, vaccines, geoengineering; homeland security, Patriot Act, 9/11, NDAA, depleted uranium. In essence, the military industrial complex, medicine, education, food, science, media, entertainment, the police state and unconstitutional government surveillance to ensure the obedience of a large population until that too is reduced for better control.
As the United States government would suggest, usually with less definitive evidence than has been illustrated in this article: so now can we bomb Saudi Arabia, steal their resources, enslave their citizens, and take their gold and silver? Their nation has to pay for harboring and supporting terrorism, doesn't it? We have to do something to keep the people looking the other way. C'mon, global elites, we'll say: it's for the victims of 9/11.
As President Bush pointed out in regards to America's invasion:
"The same folks that are bombing innocent people in Iraq were the ones
who attacked us in America on September the 11th." --Washington, D.C.,
July 12, 2007
Yes, and now the whole world sees that connection too.
*The Project for a New American Century's website has conveniently been suspended. I wonder if it's because they found out we could read or discovered that we are educating each other about their nefarious actions against humanity...
Let them know: I haven't even started yet exposing the truth.
