No. Defense Secretary Esper, Trump is the Commander in Chief

Staff Writer, DL Mullan 
Insurrection / Enemy Combatants
___________________________________

Defense Secretary Mark Esper is wrong. So wrong the question becomes why is he in a position of leadership in our government?

“The option to use active duty forces in a law enforcement role should only be used as a matter of last resort, and only in the most urgent and dire of situations. We are not in one of those situations now. I do not support invoking the Insurrection Act,” Esper stated. 

But insurrection is already taking place. Once peaceful protests erupt into violence, mayhem, death and destruction, these demonstrations are no longer protected rights under the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights. 

Former Ambassador Alan Keyes sums up the Presidents rights and responsibilities under the Constitution in this interview: Only the Commander in Chief Can Stop Civil Insurrection. 

When life, liberty, and property are being taken from the American people without due process of law, then yes, Mr. Esper, President Trump can act accordingly through the Constitution with the power of the military. 

The Insurrection Act has been updated: 

Public Law 109-364 (H.R. 5122) Oct 17, 2006 2014-06-19

Section 1076
Major changes:

Changed the title of the law from "Insurrection Act" to "Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act"

Specifies situations in which the President can invoke martial law (natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident or other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order). These had not been specified before.

Spells out the President's obligation to inform Congress within 14 days when he determines to exercise the authority, and every 14 days thereafter, during the exercise of the authority. This had also not been specified under the Insurrection Act.

President Trump has many other powers granted to him by Congress in the war on terror.

For example:

In 2012, the U.S. Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with relatively little attention from the media―despite the freedoms it obliterated. The NDAA was enacted to empower the U.S. military to fight the war on terror. But buried in this law are two provisions (Sections 1021 and 1022) that authorize the indefinite military detention, without charge or trial, of any person labeled a “belligerent”―including an American citizen.

These NDAA provisions (which have been re-approved by Congress and signed by President Obama every year since 2012) override habeas corpus―the essence of our justice system. Habeas corpus is the vital legal procedure that prevents the government from detaining you indefinitely without showing just cause. When you challenge your detention by filing a writ of habeas corpus, you must be promptly brought before a judge or into court, where lawful grounds must be shown for your detention or you must be released.

Under Section 1021, however, anyone who has committed a “belligerent act,” can be detained indefinitely, without charges or trial, as a “suspected terrorist.” This is a direct violation of the U.S. Constitution and our Bill or Rights. In The Federalist No. 84, Alexander Hamilton stressed the importance of the writ of habeas corpus to protect against “the favorite and most formidable instruments of tyranny.”

Another illustration of the power of the Presidency:

A. Military Commissions Act of 2009. Title XVIII of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2010 (the NDAA), signed into law in October 2009, replaced the Military Commissions Act of 2006 with the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (MCA 2009).

The concept of our military commissions "which by law are only for defendants who are not citizens of the United States" remains widely disparaged around the world as a second-class justice system. Some allied countries have refused to provide crucial witnesses or evidence for use in the tribunals.

Arizona has illegal aliens participating in the riots: DACA Illegal Aliens Among 200 People Arrested in Phoenix, Arizona Riots. Those individuals constitute an invading foreign force waging war within the United States.  

ANTIFA and other militant organizations are also contributing to the lawlessness. 

And, have you forgotten about: 

The detainee provisions passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2012, P.L. 112-81, affirm that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF),P.L. 107-40, in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, authorizes the detention of persons captured in connection with hostilities. The act provides for the first time a statutory definition of covered persons whose detention is authorized pursuant to the AUMF. During debate of the provision, significant attention focused on the applicability of this detention authority to U.S. citizens and other persons within the United States. The Senate adopted an amendment to clarify that the provision was not intended to affect any existing law or authorities relating to the detention of U.S. citizens or lawful resident aliens, or any other persons captured or arrested in the United States. This report analyzes the existing law and authority to detain U.S. persons, including American citizens and resident aliens, as well as other persons within the United States who are suspected of being members, agents, or associates of Al Qaeda or possibly other terrorist organizations as “enemy combatants.” The Supreme Court in 2004 affirmed the President’s power to detain “enemy combatants,” including those who are U.S. citizens, as part of the necessary force authorized by Congress after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, a plurality held that a U.S. citizen allegedly captured during combat in Afghanistan and incarcerated at a Navy brig in South Carolina is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard by a neutral decision maker regarding the government’s reasons for detaining him. On the same day, the Court in Rumsfeld v. Padillaoverturned a lower court’s grant of habeas corpus to another U.S. citizen in military custody in South Carolina on jurisdictional grounds, leaving undecided whether the authority to detain also applies to U.S. citizens arrested in the United States by civilian authorities. Lower courts that have addressed the issue of wartime detention within the United States have reached conflicting conclusions. While the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ultimately confirmed the detention authority in principle in two separate cases (one of which was subsequently vacated), the government avoided taking the argument to the Supreme Court by indicting the accused detainees for federal crimes, making their habeas appeals moot and leaving the law generally unsettled. A federal judge enjoined the detention of persons on the basis of providing support to or associating with belligerent parties under one prong of the definition enacted as Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2012, P.L. 112-81 (Hedges v. Obama), but the decision has been reversed on appeal on the basis of standing. This report provides a background to the legal issues presented, followed by a brief introduction to the law of war pertinent to the detention of different categories of individuals. An overview of U.S. practice during wartime to detain persons deemed dangerous to the national security is presented. The report concludes by discussing Congress’s role in prescribing rules for wartime detention, subsequent legislation in the 112th Congress that addresses the detention of U.S. persons, and legislative proposals in the 113th Congress to further address the issue (H.R. 1960, S. 1147, H.R. 2325, and H.R. 3304.

At the moment, the rioters along with city mayors and state governors who are allowing the wanton destruction of American life, liberty, and property fit this definition of a belligerent/enemy combatant. As well, mayors and governors have allowed protests to turn into the legal definition of Rebellion or insurrection.

18 U.S. Code § 2383. Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147

Yet these enemy combatants, militant revolutionaries, and illegal aliens continue to get bailed out of jail to terrorize their neighbors. Enough is enough. These people have no right to behave in this manner.

President Trump as Commander in Chief has numerous options open to him, including the military.

So please, Mr. Esper, tell Americans again the vastness of your wisdom because your knowledge is lacking and it shows.

Sources: Breitbart, Survival Monkey, Banned Video, American Bar, Cornell Law,   

The Case Against Surveillance: The US Government Could Have Stopped 911

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman

News / Government / 911

_______________________________

When you listen to the excuses of the American government about 911, the apologists say: 911 was an intelligence failure. Some might agree. Some may not. 

In this clip of Edward Snowden on NBC News, Americans discover that in fact the United States government had all the information it needed to stop the course of action that was 911:

Let's put that quote in slow motion, shall we?

"You know this is a key question that the 9/11 commission considered, and what they found in the postmortem when they looked at all the classified intelligence from all the different intelligence agencies, they found that we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community, as a classified sector, as the national defense of the United States, to detect this plot."

"We actually had records of the phone calls from the United States and out. The CIA knew who these guys were. The problem was not that we weren't collecting information, it wasn't that we didn't have enough dots, it wasn't that we didn't have a haystack, it was that we did not understand the haystack that we had."

Then why does the American government keep using the intelligence failure repeat? Are government officials admitting that their surveillance state failed in the eyes of history? Or are officials placing the blame on something, someone else?

Meet Susan Lindauer. A CIA Asset and go between for U.S.-Iraqi relations. Here is her testimony:

Extreme Prejudice - CIA Whistle Blower Susan Lindauer PDX 911Truth

The fact is the United States government has been illegally and unconstitutionally stealing Americans information, data, metadata for over a decade. The American government had several chances to stop the 911 attacks and did not do so.

Why would a government do such a heinous act against its people and the world?

In the VDP Gazette article, War on Terror: We're Invading Saudi Arabia... Right?, we discover many of those answers from:

Haliburton Oil's central Asian pipeline was finished (except for its Afghani segment) by last March, at which time Bush began sending U.S. troops to countries bordering Afghanistan. Haliburton Oil (Vice President Cheney's former company) and the Carlyle Group (which occasionally employs both Presidents Bush) would have benefited greatly from an oil pipeline across Afghanistan. 

to: 

Counter-terrorism and Intelligence expert Richard Clarke, the former US diplomat, recently revealed that the CIA contacted the 9/11 hijackers to recruit them before the attack. (See David Dayen’s FDL Roundup for Aug. 11 & links below.) In the days following the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden released videos denying involvement in the attacks, but did say he that Allah was punishing the US. This was the beginning of his television propaganda career.

and: 

The fact is: it's not one person, but an elite collective that is as responsible for 9/11 as the hijackers themselves. "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" is the white paper from the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). The paper outlines that America must: 

* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.

then: 

Which brings us back to the War on Terror. Aaron Russo, a flimmaker and who has since passed from cancer, was befriended by Nicholas Rockefeller for a time. Mr. Russo remembered being told many horrible details from this member of the elite, some of which was:

Nick Rockefeller told Russo about the plan to microchip the population, warned him about 'an event that would allow us to invade Afghanistan and Iraq' some eleven months before 9/11 and foretold the fact that the 'War on Terror' would be a hoax wherein soldiers would be looking in caves for non-existent enemies.

[Read the rest of War on Terror: We're Invading Saudi Arabia... Right? for the totality of the documented points.]

It's order out of chaos... a new world order. First a government creates a problem, waits for the public outcry, and gives the public the solution the government always wanted to give: servitude of the people. Rights are now privileges.

See how easy that was?

Surveillance and a police state aren't the answers to any problems except for how the ruling elite can keep on ruling without the rejection from the public. Keep the public dumbed down. Make sure the public always is a state of fear, or in the case of Hollywood: pleasure and entertainment. Offer the solution to the public for a government-made problem.

Before the public figures out the police state is not a conspiracy theory but a goal, have the gates locked with guards posted so the elite ruling class is safe to rule as overt dictators.

7 billion people to a 1000-one percenters solved.

Any questions?

Source: Better Than Ever News, Anthony Hilder 

Government Propaganda and Paid Shills, Living the Vida Twilight Zone

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Government / Surveillance
______________________________________

Have you commented on an article or been on a forum discussing topics with fellow Americans? All of a sudden someone(s) come onto the scene making it difficult for you and others to communicate? Does this person(s) appear to be pro-government and anti everything that you see for yourself?

You're not alone. 

Americans and other people from around the world are in a struggle against what are termed: Paid Shills. These people are real. They really go onto the internet to disrupt conversations in order to keep people from realizing any type of truths that may shed light on dark governmental activities. 

Yes, people will say: that's a conspiracy theory, but it isn't even if this accidental copy and paste wasn't published on the forum GodLikeProductions:

Re: Medical Type Says Sandy Hook is Total Bull#

[0x1a970000, 0x1ab00000, 0x27570000>
[rdpclip.exe, "iostatZd15.1"]
you copied a large amount of data onto the clipboard …Do you want to save this data on the clipboard?
User ID: 35850666 Korea
User ID: 36689081 Korea
User ID: 33951304 Kazak
User ID: 36809983 Kazak
N.C.S. logo.jpg
//SECRET
C:\SharePoint012USNCSauthassetsSAD_Wrkc9inet-N-7339.tx?t
**********************************
REMINDERS —— NOTES
**********************************
Sensitivity Level
Action Code
Team 5.A/
SITE
Location of official Agency folder
None NPRC
Team Contact
Sheila N******
Do any of the respondents display the urge to supply information that could be helpful to your mission?

Do the respondents appear hostile to your attempts to steer the discussion?

Have you made a personal chart taking care to note who appear to be the “leaders” versus who appear to be the “followers”?

Have you attempted to gauge the “temperature” of the forum’s users?

In other words, the prevailing social psychology of the forum’s members?

Have you been more successful with one or the other XStart methods that were demonstrated in N-7015A.DOC?

Have more technical members (Computer Programmers, Administrators, or Moderators) of the forum deduced or accused you of hiding behind a proxy?

Would you gain more trust and/or credibility if you were to use one of the Agency’s allotted “HOME” pools? (most often needed when handling EVTS that are more sensitive to the pop. of a specific locale but also location centered web sites such as FB or Patch)

Has your PREDEV “persona” been successful or do you gauge that the users find you to be too obtrusive? Accusations of being “ever present” are

The post was truncated from there.

This example shows how one person can be four different people on a forum. The person's IP address is masked as different codes.

The agent must have gotten his information from The Art of Deception: Training for a New Generation of Online Covert Operations.

At one time the government was not allowed to propagandize the American people, but that has changed. With the advent of the NDAA now the U.S. public is at the heart of the information war. Disrupt, discredit, and disinformation are the goals:

Still, not everyone is completely comfortable with the changes. Tim Cushing of TechDirt.com noted his discomfort saying, “The fact that the State Department is behind the effort doesn’t do much to allay fears that the BBG will become a tool of domestic propaganda.”

On the other hand, Cushing also points out that the progressive media is already a mouthpiece for the government all too often. Cushing ruefully says that the media “haven’t shown much reluctance to regurgitate talking points, which almost makes the BBG’s efforts seem redundant.”

When a government owns the mass media, the old laws need to be replaced with new ones. 

The Smith-Mundt Act, adopted in 1948, explicitly forbids information and psychological operations aimed at the US public. Nevertheless, the current easy access to news and information from around the globe, mades it difficult to guarantee PSYOP programs do not reach the US public. Or, in the words of Army Col. James A. Treadwell, who commanded the U.S. military psyops unit in Iraq in 2003, in the Washington Post: There's always going to be a certain amount of bleed-over with the global information environment

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (NDAA) allows for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be released within U.S. borders and struck-down the Smith-Mundt Act which banned on the dissemination of such material in the country. So as recently as LAST YEAR, more than 10 years after the beginning on the so-called "war on terrorism" the US Congress deliberately included in the NDAA, a provision allowing the government to propagandize the American people. Congress knew this component was in the Bill and Congress deliberately acted in a manner to use government resources to influence political opinion inside the country. Put simply, elected officials using government money to make sure they look good in the media. A complete and deliberate defrauding of the taxpayers by our own elected officials.

It seems the War on Terror is a war on the American psyche.

“While the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 was developed to counter communism during the Cold War, it is outdated for the conflicts of today,” Rep. [Adam] Smith says in his official statement. “Effective strategic communication and public diplomacy should be front-and-center as we work to roll back al-Qaeda’s and other violent extremists’ influence among disaffected populations.An essential part of our efforts must be a coordinated, comprehensive, adequately resourced plan to counter their radical messages and undermine their recruitment abilities. To do this, Smith-Mundt must be updated to bolster our strategic communications and public diplomacy capacity on all fronts and mediums – especially online.”

Doesn't seem as if the Congressman has been on the internet of late. The CIA is not interested in facts, figures, or diplomacy. The CIA wants to discourage free thought and the use of facts, figures, and reality. It's propoganda plain and simple.

Americans receive the government's talking points on the television news, online media, and now this propoganda is being directed straight at the People.

For more information, please read: How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations by Glenn Greenwald. (alternative LINK)

If you want to see government shills in action, go to a website that speaks the truth like Skyder Alert. Even with irrefutable photographic evidence of geoengineering in Phoenix, AZ, someone had the audacity to tell this editor those pictures weren't the droids you're looking for. 

Trolls. Shills. Paid operatives.

The next time you are online and disagree with the official stance of the United States, you too may be talking to an undercover CIA agent. 

Welcome to the new Soviet AmeriKa. [cue Twilight Zone music]

Source: TNR,WizBangBlog, RT,

War on Terror: We're Invading Saudi Arabia... Right?

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

News / Government 
_____________________________

“We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.” — George W. Bush, 9/20/01

Are you sure about that, Mr. President? Because the rooster has come home to roost. The true origins of the supposed world terrorist threat is making itself known.

The Saudi Prince, whose nickname is Bandar Bush because of his close ties to the Bush family, has been admitting he has control of terror cells and armies. 

"As mentioned, Saudi Prince Bandar Bin Sultan has recently visited the Russian capital Moscow to carry out talks with the Russian President Vladimir Putin in terms of Syria. The report states that the Saudi Prince Bandar Bin Sultan has negotiated with Vladimir Putin in “his capacity as the Prince of the Mujahedeen” in Syria and this also includes the jihadists and Islamists from Dagestan, Chechnya, and the Caucasus in Russia’s backyard."

Point of fact, the Prince's role is of a terrorist leader. In the last week, terrorist attacks have been happening again in Russia only months before the Sochi Olympic Games. 

As CBS News reported:

The first bomb went off in Volgograd's main railway station. A security camera caught the moment of the explosion. Witnesses say it was a suicide attack.

Then - less than 24 hours later - another bomb blew up a Volgograd bus. No one has yet claimed responsibility but Chechen rebels are the main suspects.

And the main target -- the Sochi Winter Olympics.

Why? You may ask. President Putin made it clear to Bandar bin Sultan that Russia would not play against Syria and its people. Their reported exchange is said to have been: 

Prince Bandar said: “I give you the guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. Chechen groups, which threaten the security of the games, are controlled by us, and they do nothing without consulting us.”

Putin responded by saying: “We know that you support the Chechen terrorist for decades. And the support, of which you just spoke openly, is completely incompatible with the common goal of fighting global terrorism. We are interested to develop friendly relations after clear and strong principles.”

“Our point in terms of Assad will never change. We believe the Syrian government is the best representative of the Syrian people and not these liver-eaters.”

Of course Putin is referring to the Syrian terrorists who have been photographed tearing out and eating the heart and liver of a Syrian soldier.

With a little research, a clear connection between terrorism and Saudi Arabia can be established. What was that quote again from President Bush?

“And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.” — George W. Bush, 9/20/01

A break in the case finally came about two weeks ago when suing Saudi Arabia was approved by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the interest of justice. 

Families of the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks today celebrated a federal court's ruling that allows relatives of people who died in the 9/11 terror attacks to sue Saudi Arabia.

Most of the hijackers who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001 were from Saudi Arabia, and the complaint states that much of the funding for the al-Qaeda terrorists came from Saudi Arabia.

An attempt to Saudi Arabia in 2002 was blocked by a federal court ruling that said the kingdom had sovereign immunity. That ruling was reversed Thursday by a three-judge federal panel.

It seems the U.S. government does everything in its power to protect the Saudis. Instead of letting a court case play out a decade ago, the government interferes and interferes. Why would the American government not want to see justice prevail?

Sherwood Ross, an award-winning journalist who has worked for the City News Bureau of Chicago, the Chicago Daily News, and for Reuters and other wire services, told me in a recent radio interview:

“It’s very doubtful that Muslims were behind 9/11. Think about this for one minute: That President Bush’s family had done business with the family of the man who allegedly made the terrorist attack, Osama Bin Laden. The Bin Laden family was actually on the board of Bush’s oil company. How is it possible that of all the billions of families in the world, the one family that makes the attack on America has done business with the President of America.

That sounds more like a favor than anything else. I don’t think 9/11 was an Arab conspiracy or a Muslim conspiracy. I think it’s an American conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States and install what is becoming a police state, and also to advance the imperial ambitions of the United States, to swindle the Middle East out of their energy resources.”

So was 9/11 an attack or a favor from Bandar Bush, the bin Laden family, and the rest of the Saudi Arabian dictatorship in order to invade sovereign Middle Eastern countries to create instability and profit for a few at the top?  

To discover the truth, then the oil pipeline in the Middle East must be discussed. Was there a financial gain for President Bush and his administration to go into sovereign countries under the guise of terrorism? 

A letter to the Editor from Wes Wilder from Tuscaloosa sums the answer up:

Haliburton Oil's central Asian pipeline was finished (except for its Afghani segment) by last March, at which time Bush began sending U.S. troops to countries bordering Afghanistan. Haliburton Oil (Vice President Cheney's former company) and the Carlyle Group (which occasionally employs both Presidents Bush) would have benefited greatly from an oil pipeline across Afghanistan.

By July a sizable number of American troops were in place around Afghanistan, and Bush offered the Taliban "a carpet of bombs or a carpet of gold" in order to obtain a right-of-way for the pipeline. As an act of good faith, Bush then issued document number 199i WF213589, which ordered the FBI and other governmental agencies to drop investigations into the bin Ladens, the Taliban and al Qeada. Agents were ordered to stop their investigations or face punishment. By last July Bush had already given the Taliban about $143 million of U.S. taxpayer money to show he was serious about his oil deal. The attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 were the result of a Bush/Cheney oil deal gone bad. Since Bush chose the interests of the oil companies over the interests of the American consumer before, there is no reason to believe he was conducting negotiations with the Taliban for our benefit. No, this is a case of George W. Bush using the power of his office for personal financial gain.

What was the intelligence community doing during all this? One woman, a CIA asset, was arrested for telling truth to power. Her name is Susan Lindauer.

In her book, Extreme Prejudice, she uses over 500 citations to make her case. She was imprisoned under the Patriot Act for trying to stop the Iraq War and later going through proper channels to testify before Congress.

For more information, please watch her presentations and lectures on Youtube including: Patriot Act Fascism below. (You'll want to take the time to watch it. Very informative.)

If you do not know about the Patriot Act or the indefinite detention clause of the NDAA, then you need to watch the videoes with Susan Lindauer to get an understanding of why these laws are unconstitutional and dangerous beyond the scope of what is reasonable.

There are other far reaching consequences to silencing people. Checks and balances disappear. The Bush Administration wanted to attack the Middle East. Nothing and no one was going to stand in the way.

Counter-terrorism and Intelligence expert Richard Clarke, the former US diplomat, recently revealed that the CIA contacted the 9/11 hijackers to recruit them before the attack. (See David Dayen’s FDL Roundup for Aug. 11 & links below.) In the days following the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden released videos denying involvement in the attacks, but did say he that Allah was punishing the US. This was the beginning of his television propaganda career.

Apparently still working as an Intelligence Asset, bin Laden then started releasing videos aimed at aiding the electoral hopes of his brother’s business associate. The long-running series’ most famous episode was the “October Surprise” video, released a few days before Election Day 2004 – the day former bin Laden associate G.W. Bush stood for reelection. The video brought a late rush of voters and monetary support to Bush, who won the controversial election.

In addition, General Wesley Clark has also admitted in an interview that "Five Countries in Seven Years" was the goal of the United States government all along: Gen. Wesley Clark, Democracy Now! interview, 2007. 

Why wasn't a connection made public earlier? You can thank the mainstream media for doing the bidding of the government. The elite-controlled American media has done everything to insulate the Bush family, bin Ladens, and other top ranking officials from questions, answers, and responsibility.

The fact is: it's not one person, but an elite collective that is as responsible for 9/11 as the hijackers themselves. "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" is the white paper from the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). The paper outlines that America must: 

* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.

The two central tenets therein are "for American forces to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars," and to "perform the 'constabulary' duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions."

The PNAC Statement of Principles is signed by Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, as well as by Eliot Abrams, Jeb Bush, Bush's special envoy to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad, and many others. William Kristol, famed conservative writer for the Weekly Standard, is also a co-founder of the group. The Weekly Standard is owned by Ruppert Murdoch, who also owns international media giant Fox News.

For a more definitive list of the PNAC membership, visit this Article: Partial list of people associated with the Project For The New American Century as well as PNAC: the "Mein Kampf" of World War IV for more information about the group and their objectives. 

No conspiracy here. Nothing to see. Move along...

PNAC states in their own words that:

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event; like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions. A decision to suspend or terminate aircraft carrier production, as recommended by this report and as justified by the clear direction of military technology, will cause great upheaval.

What was that quote from President George W. Bush again? Does it matter? A new Pearl Harbor had been commenced. The fate of the world has been forever changed for the corrupt and diabolic group think of a few individuals in the true axis of evil for global domination.

In the article entitled: The Project for the New American Century, Willam Rivers Pitt analyzes the entire PNAC document. It is a must read. The paper connects so many of the dots that are ignored by mainstream media that the facts are hard to dismiss. When you read it in its entirety, you will know why the American people have been left in the dark.

This journalistic treatise not only points the finger at the Bush family and top republicans but also points at the democrats. Our leaders from both sides of the political spectrum are involved with this conspiracy to defraud, defame, and destroy America. 

Let the reader be reminded, that this document we are quoting, which can be readily viewed at PNAC's website, (Rebuilding America's Defenses), was drafted in 1998, based on a document that was presented to the White House in 1992!

1992 - 1998 would be the end of President George H.W. Bush's term and straight into President William Jefferson Clinton's Administration. Are you upset yet? This information is but the tip of the iceberg. When people dig further, the whole dynamic of (the government behind) the government's purpose is revealed.

Under President Barack Obama little has differed in course from the PNAC agenda. For someone whose political platform was about change, the American people have seen George W. Bush's terms number three and four instead. President Obama also signed the NDAA, section 1021 (indefinite detention) into law in 2012. Not the change the people voted for.

Why is that? The same people who have been in charge behind the scenes are still in charge. No matter who is voted in, the power elite controls what does and does not happen in the world.

Hillary Clinton and Chris Christie, or whoever the next presidential contenders will be, are not going to change that fact. Why would they want to? An elitist, no matter their stripes, is still an elitist. 

If you want to know more, then read anything from Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Republican as well as Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, and now is President Barack Obama's foreign policy advisor. The Post-American World from Fareed Zakaria, a Bilderberg insider, is an eye-opener. Read the white papers from the Council on Foreign Relations, OECD, Trilateral Commission, books by Bilderberg group members, and any think tank supported by Carnegie, Rockefeller, Carlyle Group, or Ivy League University.

These power elites think up something and the rest of the world pays the price for it. Over and over again their made up problems for the people to react to so that the elite's solution can be implemented is duplicated and repeated. The relentless rituals to do wrong against the world never ceases to destroy.

“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”

Exactly, President G.W. Bush, it is Ordo ab Chao. We are living the nightmare of the imperialistic philosophy: Order out of Chaos. The elite are drunk with absolute corrupt power and out of control on an unprecedented level. 

Which brings us back to the War on Terror. Aaron Russo, a flimmaker and who has since passed from cancer, was befriended by Nicholas Rockefeller for a time. Mr. Russo remembered being told many horrible details from this member of the elite, some of which was:

Nick Rockefeller told Russo about the plan to microchip the population, warned him about 'an event that would allow us to invade Afghanistan and Iraq' some eleven months before 9/11 and foretold the fact that the 'War on Terror' would be a hoax wherein soldiers would be looking in caves for non-existent enemies.

With all this evidence coming to the forefront, how can any American not demand that these elites be arrested and tried for treason, war crimes, and crimes against humanity? Who is going to do it? The Justice Department?

Remember who you vote for is the same person you would not vote for in any election because the elites own the political process. So how is this juggernaut going to be blocked from advancement?

There is a conspiracy going on in the world. People pointing out the connections are not crazy; they simply see what others do not want uncovered. The time has come when the truth can no longer be stifled by mainstream media, politicians, or despots. The time for people to speak truth to power has come. The truth has become the counterbalance campaign against the destruction of humanity.

Truths like the Bush family is associated with the bin Ladens and Bandar bin Sultan (Bandar Bush, the "Prince of the Mujahedeen") as well as George H.W. Bush's CIA connections and his family's corporate relationships that have become but one chapter in the elite's handbook.

The rest of the elite's macabre manual uses think tanks, experts, The Project for a New American Century, CFR, OECD, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg; rebels, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nursa, terrorism, "War on Terror", Arab Spring; global warming, climate change, international law, sustainability, multiculturalism, racism, political correctness, communitarianism, consensus, the United Nations; population control, GMO's, pharmaceuticals, fluoride, vaccines, geoengineering; homeland security, Patriot Act, 9/11, NDAA, depleted uranium. In essence, the military industrial complex, medicine, education, food, science, media, entertainment, the police state and unconstitutional government surveillance to ensure the obedience of a large population until that too is reduced for better control.

As the United States government would suggest, usually with less definitive evidence than has been illustrated in this article: so now can we bomb Saudi Arabia, steal their resources, enslave their citizens, and take their gold and silver? Their nation has to pay for harboring and supporting terrorism, doesn't it? We have to do something to keep the people looking the other way.  C'mon, global elites, we'll say: it's for the victims of 9/11.

As President Bush pointed out in regards to America's invasion:

"The same folks that are bombing innocent people in Iraq were the ones who attacked us in America on September the 11th." --Washington, D.C., July 12, 2007

Yes, and now the whole world sees that connection too.

Source: Right Wing News, Syria News, Banoosh, CBS News, ABC News, Time for Truth, Fire Dog Lake, 11th Hour, About Political Humor, Mint Press News, Jones Report,Think Exist, The Project for a New American Century*

*The Project for a New American Century's website has conveniently been suspended. I wonder if it's because they found out we could read or discovered that we are educating each other about their nefarious actions against humanity...  

Let them know: I haven't even started yet exposing the truth. 

Michigan's Nullification of the 2012 NDAA Indefinite Detention

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

News / Government

_____________________________

As of yesterday, Governor Rick Snyder of Michigan signed into law the nullification of the indefinite detention section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA.

Well, sort of.

Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey explained: 

“By including a caveat — if such aid would place that state agency, political subdivision, employee, or member of the Michigan national guard in violation of the United States constitution, the state constitution of 1963, or any law of this state — the bill is not an express prohibition. Rather, since no official determination has been made on such constitutionality as of yet, it leaves the decision of constitutionality to discretion. But, the new law does provide legal backing for those sheriffs, law enforcement officers, and other agencies and employees, who refuse to assist the federal government in such activities based on their own constitutional determination.”

Wouldn't Americans rather have a complete ban on unconstitutional behavior from every law enforcement agency?

For those who do not know: 

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Court Case

Extending the principle applied in New York, the Court in Printz v. United States 5 held that Congress may not “circumvent” the prohibition on commandeering a state’s regulatory processes “by conscripting the State’s officers directly.” 6 Struck down in Printz were interim provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Protection Act that required state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on prospective handgun purchasers. “The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers . . . to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case–by–case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty.” 7

If this Michigan law holds, then states can do more to offset the unprecedented and overreaching unconstitutional laws Congress has been passing and the Executive Orders being signed by the President of the United States to act as laws that are not under his constitutional purview, for which he has no power to do.

The tide could turn back to reigning in the out of control federal government and restore rights and sanity back to this nation.

Source: Cornell Law, This Nation

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied, When We Have Time for You

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Government / News
______________________________________

Politicians have a disingenuous way of showing their appreciation for their constituents, oath of office, and allegiance to the US Constitution. Often voters are met with time constraints on their First Amendment Right to Free Speech, then a voter's real issue is ignored for months on end, and in addition the voter is made to wait unreasonable amounts of time in order to speak publicly to their elected officials.

Who is working for whom here exactly? 

Now enter the case of Daphne Lee. After her resolution sat for eight months at the county level with no action, Ms. Lee spoke at her Clark County Commission meeting in the state of Nevada. She got to address these supposed leaders after waiting another eight hours.

This topic is what Daphne Lee is fighting for: 

The PANDA (People Against the NDAA Mission Statement:

Our Mission is to nonviolently defeat, strike down, repeal, stop, void and fight the indefinite detention provisions, Sections 1021 and 1022, of the National Defense Authorization Act for the Fiscal Year of 2012, to fight for American civil liberties, to combat laws restricting liberty in the interest of National Security, to support current government officials that are doing so and to engage a younger generation in the politics of the United States so this cannot happen again.

 Here is Daphne Lee's fiery response:

As she quoted one of the commissioner's "justice delayed is justice denied," a statement attributed to the three term Victorian Prime Minister of Great Britain, William E. Gladstone, she pointed out the discrepancies in the Commission's behavior. 

Since her duty to protect her fellow citizens from an overreaching government's obliteration of due process was obstructed for so long, she stood to extend that elusive hand of justice.

What she said. What she fights for. What Daphne expects from her elected officials is shocking: she wants rights restored, due process protected, and citizens respected. 

When we have time for you... that seems to be the modus operandi for most politicians. If your grievance does not fit into their schema, then you are out of luck being considered or heard. When a politician is so wrong that is not laughable, again, good luck getting anyone to answer the phone or return an email without condescension.

This remark does not come lightly especially when you consider facts like these:

Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that “Al Qaeda” is not really a terrorist group but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to funnel guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan.

“I first heard about Al-Qaida while I was attending the Command and Staff course in Jordan. I was a French officer at that time and the French Armed Forces had close contacts and cooperation with Jordan . . .

“Two of my Jordanian colleagues were experts in computers. They were air defense officers. Using computer science slang, they introduced a series of jokes about students’ punishment.

“For example, when one of us was late at the bus stop to leave the Staff College, the two officers used to tell us: ‘You’ll be noted in ‘Q eidat il-Maaloomaat’ which meant ‘You’ll be logged in the information database.’ Meaning ‘You will receive a warning . . .’ If the case was more severe, they would used to talk about ‘Q eidat i-Taaleemaat.’ Meaning ‘the decision database.’ It meant ‘you will be punished.’ For the worst cases they used to speak of logging in ‘Al Qaida.’

Here's another fascinating fact mainstream media refuses to share with the American public: 

“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the ‘TV watcher’ to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money.”

Read the entire article here. The piece is too lengthy to publish on the Gazette, but the writing is well worth the effort to read. 

When people see that indefinite detention is for "terrorism," but know the truth about this alleged endless war against ghosts hiding in desert caves, people begin to stand up against their government.

So you believe it's a Conspiracy Theory? Terrorism is actually real? Then you need to watch the interview with the late Aaron Russo and his time with Nick Rockefeller. Admissions from an elite oligarch to this director of Trading Places. The history you know is not the history that is. 

View the full film: Reflections and Warnings from Aaron Russo or his documentary, America: Freedom to Fascism. No more can people say: Conspiracy Theory! The only conspiracy theory is what mainstream media propagates on every news cast.

Think this information is wild? Check out where your income taxes had been going: The Bank of England and the Vatican. Karen Hudes a whistleblower from the World Bank, a Yale graduate and Senior Counsel for over two decades, comes forward to discuss how the world is being manipulated behind the scenes.

Still doubt the truth? Then begin to research: TAFTA, NAFTA, NDAA, Patriot Act, Maurice Strong, Agenda 21, Sustainability, TPP... the list is endless, but well worth the education. 

Daphne Lee understands the stakes. Karen Hudes lost her job over it. Aaron Russo explained it with his last breath. Take some time to unravel the mystery of history and current events.

People are speaking truth to power... justice lives. Are you ready to listen?

Source: Ben Swann, Daphne Lee Youtube, ThinkQuest, Global Research,