Showing posts with label torture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label torture. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Connecticut: Go for the Sex and Driver's License but Not for Medical Care

Staff Writer, J.J. West
Age of Consent / Medical Rights
___________________________________

We all have basic human rights. In the past few decades, the government has seen fit to infringe on these rights and supplant freedom with privileges. No more has this overreach been felt more but in the radicalization of doctors, hospitals, and child protective services. 

Justina Pelletier lived through this invasion with Boston Hospital for over a year. Phoenix Children's Hospital has been engaging in this type of criminal conduct with Melissa Diegel's children: Kayla and Hannah.

Now the state of Connecticut has decided to imprison and medicate a 17-year old because she did not want to treat her cancer with chemotherapy but by more beneficial means through natural adjuvants. 
“It’s a question of fundamental constitutional rights–the right to have a say over what happens to your body–and the right to say to the government ‘you can’t control what happens to my body,'” said Cassandra’s mother’s attorney, Michael S. Taylor. Taylor represents Cassandra’s mother, while a state public defender represents Cassandra.
What this young woman endures is beyond anything a state, hospital, or doctor should have the power to do to another human being.
In September, Cassandra was diagnosed with late stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Doctors recommended she undergo chemotherapy as treatment, but the teen refused. Her mother supported her in her decision and told the hospital that they were going to seek a second opinion – but doctors weren’t satisfied and reported the family to DCF under charges of “medical negligence.” The state held a hearing in November, and granted DCF temporary custody of the teen. The court ordered that Cassandra’s mother, Jackie Fortin, “to provide and cooperate with medical care under DCF’s supervision and as recommended by her doctors.”

Under DCF custody, Cassandra was forced to undergo chemotherapy treatments at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center. After her first two treatments, Cassandra ran away from home in order to avoid further treatment.

However, her attempt to avoid treatment – treatment that she did not want – only increased DCF’s grip on the case. Cassandra was subsequently removed from the home.Her mother is now allowed to visit only twice a week for two hours. All her visits are supervised by DCF, and the state agency has been granted authority to make all medical decisions concerning the teen.

According to her mother, Cassandra has even been strapped down to a hospital bed for some of these procedures. She has not been permitted to leave her hospital room for approximately four weeks.
This type of behavior from authorities is unacceptable. It is literally legalized torture.

After two weeks of forced chemotherapy mandated by the state, the 17-year old ran away. Now the Connecticut Supreme Court states that that means the young woman is too immature to make her own decisions. Really? Who wouldn't run away after being treated like this young woman has been?

Which Connecticut Supreme Court Justice would agree to be tied down, imprisoned, and force fed poison? Everyone else, as long as it is not them:
The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that state officials aren't violating the rights of a 17-year-old girl by forcing her to undergo cancer chemotherapy she doesn't want.

Justices ruled Thursday in the case of the girl known in court documents only as Cassandra C., who will be free to make her own medical decisions when she turns 18 in September.
Yes. You are violating her rights. Let's talk about Connecticut's Age of Consent Law:
The Connecticut legal Age of Consent for sexual contact is 16 years old. There are a total of A total of thirty one states have set their age of consent at 16, the lowest age of consent in any state.

The age of consent in Connecticut is raised to 18 in certain scenarios, such as when the older partner is in a position of power such as a non-School teacher, athletic coach, or some other position of power.
and 
Finally, minors UNDER the age of 16 and at least 13 years old can consent to sex with anyone no more then 3 years older then they are.
So in Connecticut a teenager has the legal right to have sex, produce children as well as be given a license to drive a deadly weapon, but cannot make their own medical decisions? Smells like hypocrisy to me.

Maybe if she commits a capitol crime, Connecticut would hold her accountable as an adult and no longer use her as their guinea pig? 

The Connecticut Supreme Court needs to reevaluate itself as well as doctors' and hospitals' behavior. The state should only be called in for extreme cases of person or persons who are in need of assistance. Case in point, Child Protective Services should save children from abusive situations, not in cases where the doctors want to override parental consent or decisions, especially for filling their pocketbooks instead of understanding that barbaric allopathic medicine is not the answer to everything. 

Information on alternative medicines is widely available with a plethora of studies and positive outcome cases. One such case happened twenty years ago. He too ran away from chemotherapy, but the action turned into a blessing:

From the bits and pieces of media coverage since the time Billy ran off, one gets the impression that Billy wound up in California. And from there he discovered cancer-healing protocols for his Hodgkin’s lymphoma. But actually, he never reached California. That was his Greyhound bus destination originally, but he wound up in Houston, TX.

Instead of roaming the streets as many run-away teens do, he was fortunate enough to meet up with fellow skateboarders who helped house him. Billy had no idea of there was a nationwide hunt for his return. His parents had contacted several national news outlets out of concern for his whereabouts and health.

But one day, the father of one of Billy’s skateboarder buddies said he saw Billy on one of the TV shows featuring his runaway from home after five chemo treatments. So Billy decided to return home with one provision: no chemotherapy.

Instead, he would decide on alternative methods. His nationwide exposure had elicited many suggestions from which he could choose.
Billy used 714-X and Essiac tea (recipe) for the same cancer the Connecticut 17-year old has and cured his cancer.

So why is the young woman in Connecticut being forced to take treatments that poison the body instead of using known healing modalities? Money. Power. Control. Diseases of our judicial, medical, and child protective services systems that need to be cured of their hubris with a lawsuit of epic portions when the Connecticut 17-year old turns 18.

There are non-pharmaceutical treatments for cancer, but that would cut into corporate, hospital, doctor, and now state profits. Many such effective treatments are banned in lieu of the more expensive and toxic chemotherapy treatments.

So Connecticut who are you really protecting? A young woman old enough for sex, procreation, and a driver's license? Or the pharmaceutical and hospital industries that do not actually cure anything?

For more information, please read these VDP Gazette articles about Minors and Medical / CPS Crimes by the State: 
Kidnapping by Hospital, Family Ripped Apart for Almost 1 Year 
AZ CPS, Phoenix Children's Hospital Engaged in Child Abduction
Veganism, the New Mental Illness Defined by Arizona's Very Own CPS
AZ Parents Have NO Rights: The Best Interest of Your Child is NOT You According to CPS
These crimes are ongoing throughout America. Won't you make your voices heard?

Also see: How to Take Our Court System Back, isn't it time? 

Additional Note:17 Year old Allowed Mail, writer her,
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Patient Cassandra C
282 Washington Street
Hartford, CT 06106



Source: Age of Consent, Billy Best, Liberty Doll, WVTY,

Monday, December 29, 2014

Criminal Complaint Against Bush Era Architects of Torture

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman
Laws / Torture
_________________________________

Europe is taking a stand against torture. When will the United States act to indict politicians, legal and medical advisers who advocate and do torture? 

Torture is not an American value. It is a war crime.  

17 December 2014 – The ECCHR has today lodged criminal complaints against former CIA head George Tenet, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other members of the administration of former US President George W. Bush. The ECCHR is accusing Tenet, Rumsfeld and a series of other persons of the war crime of torture under paragraph 8 section 1(3) of the German Code of Crimes against International Law (Völkerstrafgesetzbuch). The constituent elements of the crime of torture were most recently established in the case by the US Senate in its report on CIA interrogation methods. “The architects of the torture system - politicians, officials, secret service agents, lawyers and senior army officials – should be brought before the courts,” says ECCHR General Secretary Wolfgang Kaleck, who is appearing today in connection with the issue in front of the German Parliamentary Committee on legal affairs. “By investigating members of the Bush administration, Germany can help to ensure that those responsible for abduction, abuse and illegal detention do not go unpunished.”

The US Senate report devotes one section explicitly to the case of German citizen Khaled El Masri, who was abducted by CIA agents in 2004 due to a case of mistaken identity and was tortured in a secret detention center in Afghanistan. The criminal complaint details the US Senate report’s finding that once the unlawful error was discovered, the former CIA director refused to take further steps against those responsible...

Source: ECCHR

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Enemy of the State: Rodney Class Denied Medical Care

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman
Courts / Law / Constitution
___________________________________

Is this how we run our court system? 
Rodney was arrested, shuttled about the country, held incommunicado, denied his necessary heart medicine, and denied bond. Rodney's crime? Having a firearm in his automobile. I learned this morning at 9:00 am that Rodney had a court hearing at 10:30am before Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts at the US Courthouse at 333 Constitution Avenue, Washington DC. I went to Courtroom 9, and six friends of Rodney's, who came from far away to attend the hearing, were in the hall because Judge Roberts had locked the door (ostensibly to allow Rodney to read something). The Judge unlocked the doors for three minutes at the very end of the hearing, and we managed to get in so that Rodney could see that we were there for him.
Read more here.

The firearm law was found to be unconstitutional by the courts so why is this case still proceeding?
Senior District Court Judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr., a former Army colonel appointed to the court by President George H.W. Bush, ruled that the right to a weapon extended outside the home both for residents and visitors to Washington.

Going well beyond the Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia vs. Heller, Scullin found that carrying arms outside the home for self-defense fell within the legal definition of the right to bear arms enunciated in the 2nd Amendment.
Source: Karen Hudes, LA Times,  

Thursday, August 14, 2014

America Is Not the Greatest Country Anymore

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Government / The People 
______________________________________

What we are experiencing in our country today is by design. Think tanks, policy groups, and non-govermental organizations have made our country into a declining rock in the western hemisphere. Not all the blame can be levied in one direction. Anyone who does not learn about the real world and bridge that gap between the uninformed and the awake are part of the problem as well. 

You have been duped. 

That's not your fault, but ignoring others by calling them names like "Tin Foil Hat" or "Conspiracy Theorist" is. 

Like canaries in a coal mine who warn the miners of impeding danger, we in the New Media are trying to get your attention. 

America is not great anymore because Americans refuse to stand up. Stand up to corruption. Stand up to Agenda 21 and Sustainability. Stand up to Gitmo, torture. Stand up to drones in our skies. Stand up to polluters, gmo manufacturers, and agencies who breach the threshold of decency and the Constitution. 

Yes, there are those awake individuals doing most of the heavy lifting. Isn't this your country too? When are you going to step up and carry some of that weight? When you lose your car, property rights? When your grandchildren are unable to read or add?

What's it going to take?

America used to be great because Americans used to be informed, educated, and moral as specified in the best soliloquy television had offered on the show, The Newsroom: 


Our government is out of control. Our voters do not make policy. A recipe for tyranny and disaster awaits if we don't begin to stand up for what is right, moral, and just. 

Or, we might as well put up a different kind of flag, the one of surrender. 


Source: Youtube

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Medieval Torture Devices, Gruesome Death, or American Fiscal Policy: There's a Difference?

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman
Medieval History / Finance
__________________________________

In this episode of the Keiser Report, Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert discuss the brutal tortured to death industry in America and suggest some Medieval ideas, such as the Tub, the Lead Sprinkler and the Brazen Bull. They compare these old techniques to the modern financial and monetary systems in which, for example, investors’ wealth is trapped inside the ‘Brazen Bull’ and the Dow hitting all time highs is actually these investors screaming in financial pain. In the second half, Max interviews Reggie Middleton of BoomBustBlog.com about ‘Reggie Middleton’s Ultracoin’ being to crypto what Google is to the internet - a gatekeeper of value on the blockchain.

Source: Keiser Report

Friday, May 9, 2014

Munk Debate on State Surveillance: Greenwald/Ohanian vs Hayden/Dershowitz

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman
Government / Surveillance State
______________________________

A great debate between pro and con of state surveillance.

Munk Debate on State Surveillance:Greenwald/Ohanian vs Hayden/Dershowitz 

It is the debate of the moment. In a risk-filled world, are democracies justified in turning to large-scale state surveillance, at home and abroad, to fight complex and unconventional threats? Or is the emergence of the surveillance state and the awesome powers it derives from information technology a new and pervasive threat to our basic freedoms? For some the answer is obvious: the threats more than justify the current surveillance system, and the laws and institutions of democracies are more than capable of balancing the needs of individual privacy with collective security. For others, we are in peril of sacrificing to state surveillance and exaggerated terrorist threats the civil liberties that guarantee citizens' basic freedoms. To engage this global debate our spring 2014 contest moves the motion:

Be it resolved state surveillance is a legitimate defence of our freedoms....

More: http://leaksource.info/2014/05/03/mun...


Youtube: Munk Debate