Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Big Tech Censorship / 1st Amendment
Big Tech Censorship / 1st Amendment
___________________________________
“Under well-established law, neither Facebook nor any other publisher can be liable for failing to publish someone else’s message...”
The stupidest line in a legal document Facebook could ever have written.
Facebook will now owe its users for their data since Facebook steals and sells users' information without compensation.
Worse, than stealing and turning a profit while lying to their users, Facebook is open to 6 USCS § 101:
Facebook has banned individuals under the corporate terminology of: dangerous individuals. Which without due process of law, Facebook has then committed defamation and other speech liabilities. Because of this terminology, Facebook has allowed threats and acts of violence in their community guidelines specifying "dangerous individuals," marking them as targets and placing their lives in danger. Facebook intimidates or coerces a civilian population not to speak certain names or uphold their beliefs in the Second Amendment. The label of "dangerous individuals" has deplatformed and depersoned several individuals from most social media as well as allowed banks, credit card companies, Uber/Lyft, Paypal, and Youtube to name a few to also discriminate against these individuals without cause or due process of law. Without the ability to make a living, that act endangers human life. Facebook has colluded with other social media in racketeering and possible RICO violations of criminal laws to ban people without due process of law as well as become an overall nuisance to our society. Facebook has perjured itself in front of Congress and influenced governmental policies through its censorship by meddling in elections.
Facebook as well as the other Tech Giants have checked off most of the legal definition of terrorism:
According to 6 USCS § 101, the term terrorism is "any activity that--
(A) involves an act that--
(i) is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive of critical infrastructure or key resources; and(B) appears to be intended--
(ii) is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State or other subdivision of the United States; and
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping."
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act gave Facebook some measure of protection if the corporation had adhered to the law, but instead Facebook wants to control, censor, and dominate speech and thought.
Facebook wants the protection of the Bill of Rights while telling the rest of America and the world that their speech does not matter.
Laura Loomer has the tech company in a vice of its own making. Facebook defamed Ms. Loomer as well as countless others. Facebook has also placed her life and livelihood in danger with its policies and guidelines.
If others file suits of their own, Facebook's stocks will drop and the tech giant could see its monopoly be dissolved.
What are you waiting for?
Source: The Daily Coin, US Legal, RT, Laura Loomer
