Big Tech Hides Behind the First Amendment While Depriving You of Your Freedom of Speech

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Big Tech Censorship / 1st Amendment

 ___________________________________

“Under well-established law, neither Facebook nor any other publisher can be liable for failing to publish someone else’s message...”

The stupidest line in a legal document Facebook could ever have written. 

Facebook will now owe its users for their data since Facebook steals and sells users' information without compensation. 

Worse, than stealing and turning a profit while lying to their users, Facebook is open to 6 USCS § 101:

Facebook has banned individuals under the corporate terminology of: dangerous individuals. Which without due process of law, Facebook has then committed defamation and other speech liabilities. Because of this terminology, Facebook has allowed threats and acts of violence in their community guidelines specifying "dangerous individuals," marking them as targets and placing their lives in danger. Facebook intimidates or coerces a civilian population not to speak certain names or uphold their beliefs in the Second Amendment. The label of "dangerous individuals" has deplatformed and depersoned several individuals from most social media as well as allowed banks, credit card companies, Uber/Lyft, Paypal, and Youtube to name a few to also discriminate against these individuals without cause or due process of law. Without the ability to make a living, that act endangers human life. Facebook has colluded with other social media in racketeering and possible RICO violations of criminal laws to ban people without due process of law as well as become an overall nuisance to our society. Facebook has perjured itself in front of Congress and influenced governmental policies through its censorship by meddling in elections. 

Facebook as well as the other Tech Giants have checked off most of the legal definition of terrorism:

According to 6 USCS § 101, the term terrorism is "any activity that--

(A) involves an act that--

(i) is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive of critical infrastructure or key resources; and
(ii) is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State or other subdivision of the United States; and

(B) appears to be intended--

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping."

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act gave Facebook some measure of protection if the corporation had adhered to the law, but instead Facebook wants to control, censor, and dominate speech and thought. 

Facebook wants the protection of the Bill of Rights while telling the rest of America and the world that their speech does not matter.

Laura Loomer has the tech company in a vice of its own making. Facebook defamed Ms. Loomer as well as countless others. Facebook has also placed her life and livelihood in danger with its policies and guidelines.

If others file suits of their own, Facebook's stocks will drop and the tech giant could see its monopoly be dissolved.

What are you waiting for?


Source: The Daily Coin, US Legal, RT, Laura Loomer 

Hillary Clinton, Twitter Attack a Disabled Editor

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Tech Monopolies / Hillary Clinton

________________________________

Earlier today, Hillary Clinton was on Twitter complaining that the current administration banned Transgendered individuals from serving our nation via the military. 

Yet Mrs. Clinton used Twitter's Terms of Service to attack a disabled person. She falsely accused this disabled editor of Hate Conduct/Speech for pointing out facts. 

Unless someone can enumerate the hate filled content in the below statement: 

So I lodged a complaint in my response to Twitter and will shortly see if there is a complaint I can file against this political retaliatory action through the FCC or other federal agency. My free speech was violated. I was respectful in my conveyance of the way Transgender people are abused by political figures like Hillary Clinton instead of receiving the mental health support that they so need.

 

Mrs. Clinton, this type of negative behavior is exactly why a good portion of the American electorate did not see you as worthy, professional, or capable of being President of the United States.

I would refrain from making such immature decisions in the future.

If you cannot conduct yourself in a manner befitting a public figure, then perhaps you should retired from public life altogether and let the adults handle our political, social, and economic challenges that face the United States of America.

You have displayed retaliatory behavior against a disabled woman and positioned yourself to harm people with mental disorders for political gain. 

That is shameful indeed. 

Twitter is no better enabling such conduct amongst a swath of celebrities and politicos at the cost of others free and protected speech. 

Isn't about time you all grew up?

Sources: Twitter, Hillary Clinton

Changing the National Conversation: Corporate Spying and Tracking of Americans Needs to End

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Network of Corporate Control / Government Overreach

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Americans more than any other time in history are being tagged, tracked, and punished without due process of law. Corporations bribe our Congress to pass laws that undermine our rights to privacy, be secure in our persons, and due process of law. 

A recent development made the Network of Corporate Control all to clear and it is about time the American people disbanded monopolies and regained control of their personal information. 

Back doors into software and security features were created for governments to bypass probable cause and warrants in order to conduct criminal search and seizures for prosecution. Corporations have done this unconstitutional act with contract law. 

Contract law goes: I have a contract with my ISP, so that means I have given up my rights to privacy to not only the ISP but to third party corporations who cry copyright infringement every time you look at something cross-eyed. With the advent of "fake news" to censor our ability to access real information that is not government sponsored, now advertisers pull their revenue sharing and list any real information as fake or tainted or wrong.

Why are Americans putting up with corporate censorship and gatekeeping? Why are Americans allowing their politicians to change laws for corporate profiteering and spying? Why are Americans accepting biased court rulings when our Founding Fathers warned against corporate monopolies, control, and censorship?

When are Americans going to fight back?  

We need judges who are not corrupted by corporate whining and stomping around when it is the corporations responsibility to protect their information, not Joe Public. For example, I do not work for the corporations. I have no reason to protect what is not my responsibility to do so. Even software companies have been handed that responsibility by the courts, Now with the new copyright laws, anyone off the street bares the responsibility of corporate failure to do their due diligence. 

Can you say company town?

We need politicians to work for the People they were elected to represent. We need the People to stand up to this spy grid. Americans need to reestablish corporate and government boundaries when it comes to privacy protections.

So if anyone is out there listening, Americans need to sit down and devise new avenues of communication. We need a new internet that is free from corporate and government spying, tracking, and punishment without probable cause. No corporation should have the power to enter homes by stealth and get away with warrantless search and seizure through a contract. Innocent before proven guilty, yet corporations and governments have forgotten that the American people do not work for them. 

The laws are to protect our privacy and rights; the laws are not designed to do that for souless corporations. Corporations have no breath. Corporations have no life. They are a fiction. A representation on paper, corporations do not have an existence.

Americans will have to demand that corporations become redefined as something other than a person. Corporations are not people. Corporations have become agencies of governments. Corporations have redefined themselves by bribing the People's representatives into enacting unconstitutional laws for power and control of resources. 

Let's stop fighting amongst each other and fight for something more dear: our self respect. 

Americans need to demand the restoration of our basic inalienable rights before corporations become the gods the elite wish them to be.

EU Out of Control: Brexit Now Crucial for Basic Human Rights

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Globalism / Human Rights
________________________________

Censorship worthy of China is being discussed by the corrupt European Union. Here is their white paper: 

Communication on Online Platforms and the Digital Single Market Opportunities 

and Challenges for Europe

Essentially to "protect" everyone, which is the corporations and governments, that there should be an internet identification (ID) that would curb bad things like "hate speech."

Here's what the EU believes about how a person should be tied to the internet:

It is recognised that a multitude of username and password combinations is both inconvenient and a security risk. However, the frequent practice of using one’s platform profile to access a range of websites and services often involves non-transparent exchanges and cross- linkages of personal data between various online platforms and websites. As a remedy, in order to keep identification simple and secure, consumers should be able to choose the credentials by which they want to identify or authenticate themselves. In particular, online platforms should accept credentials issued or recognised by national public authorities, such as electronic or mobile IDs, national identity cards, or bank cards.

Why is the British people staying in the European Union when the EU does not respect their basic human rights? 

In America, our federal government has been pushing the National ID Act on states. So when are people and states going to rise to the occasion and tell the corporation masquerading as our government what to go do with itself? 

Internet ID's is plain and simple: censorship. Step out line, disobey the government, or write a negative critique of a business and your internet "privileges" that you pay a high cost for are suspended or revoked. 

Hate speech is another word for censorship. Freedom of Speech protects speech you do not like to hear. There is no such thing as "hate speech" only censorship.

People of the world: take your countries back away from these haters of basic human rights of freedom and expression. 


Source: EU