The Medical Kidnapping of Cassandra Callender

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Medical Tyranny / Child Protective Services Kidnapping of Children
_____________________________________________________

A perfect example of why judges should be removed from their positions, and any one who forced this young woman to do chemotherapy against her will should lose their medical/practicing licenses. 

Not your body; not your choice. 

The Medical Kidnapping of Cassandra Callender

In this video, cancer researcher Ty Bollinger speaks with 17-year-old Cassandra Callender (aka “Cassandra C.”). This is Cassandra's first video interview since her real life medical kidnapping in December 2014. Cassandra shares how she was forced by the police and the Connecticut Department of Children and Families (DCF) to undergo chemotherapy treatments for Hodgkin’s lymphoma against her will.

Source: Truth About Cancer

Karen Hudes Whistleblower on the Chris Ponte Show

Staff Writer, DB Holmes

Finance / History
__________________________________

Karen Hudes Whistleblower on the Chris Ponte Show

Karen Hudes describes state capture of the courts, the Congress, and the switch away from Federal Reserve Notes for Chris Ponte's Danbury, Connecticut public access TV show, pre-taped on 1/26/15, the day before a blizzard on the scheduled show time.

Source: Karen Hudes

Connecticut: Go for the Sex and Driver's License but Not for Medical Care

Staff Writer, J.J. West

Age of Consent / Medical Rights
___________________________________

We all have basic human rights. In the past few decades, the government has seen fit to infringe on these rights and supplant freedom with privileges. No more has this overreach been felt more but in the radicalization of doctors, hospitals, and child protective services. 

Justina Pelletier lived through this invasion with Boston Hospital for over a year. Phoenix Children's Hospital has been engaging in this type of criminal conduct with Melissa Diegel's children: Kayla and Hannah.

Now the state of Connecticut has decided to imprison and medicate a 17-year old because she did not want to treat her cancer with chemotherapy but by more beneficial means through natural adjuvants. 

“It’s a question of fundamental constitutional rights–the right to have a say over what happens to your body–and the right to say to the government ‘you can’t control what happens to my body,'” said Cassandra’s mother’s attorney, Michael S. Taylor. Taylor represents Cassandra’s mother, while a state public defender represents Cassandra.

What this young woman endures is beyond anything a state, hospital, or doctor should have the power to do to another human being.

In September, Cassandra was diagnosed with late stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Doctors recommended she undergo chemotherapy as treatment, but the teen refused. Her mother supported her in her decision and told the hospital that they were going to seek a second opinion – but doctors weren’t satisfied and reported the family to DCF under charges of “medical negligence.” The state held a hearing in November, and granted DCF temporary custody of the teen. The court ordered that Cassandra’s mother, Jackie Fortin, “to provide and cooperate with medical care under DCF’s supervision and as recommended by her doctors.”

Under DCF custody, Cassandra was forced to undergo chemotherapy treatments at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center. After her first two treatments, Cassandra ran away from home in order to avoid further treatment.

However, her attempt to avoid treatment – treatment that she did not want – only increased DCF’s grip on the case. Cassandra was subsequently removed from the home.Her mother is now allowed to visit only twice a week for two hours. All her visits are supervised by DCF, and the state agency has been granted authority to make all medical decisions concerning the teen.

According to her mother, Cassandra has even been strapped down to a hospital bed for some of these procedures. She has not been permitted to leave her hospital room for approximately four weeks.

This type of behavior from authorities is unacceptable. It is literally legalized torture.

After two weeks of forced chemotherapy mandated by the state, the 17-year old ran away. Now the Connecticut Supreme Court states that that means the young woman is too immature to make her own decisions. Really? Who wouldn't run away after being treated like this young woman has been?

Which Connecticut Supreme Court Justice would agree to be tied down, imprisoned, and force fed poison? Everyone else, as long as it is not them:

The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that state officials aren't violating the rights of a 17-year-old girl by forcing her to undergo cancer chemotherapy she doesn't want.

Justices ruled Thursday in the case of the girl known in court documents only as Cassandra C., who will be free to make her own medical decisions when she turns 18 in September.

Yes. You are violating her rights. Let's talk about Connecticut's Age of Consent Law:

The Connecticut legal Age of Consent for sexual contact is 16 years old. There are a total of A total of thirty one states have set their age of consent at 16, the lowest age of consent in any state.

The age of consent in Connecticut is raised to 18 in certain scenarios, such as when the older partner is in a position of power such as a non-School teacher, athletic coach, or some other position of power.

and 

Finally, minors UNDER the age of 16 and at least 13 years old can consent to sex with anyone no more then 3 years older then they are.

So in Connecticut a teenager has the legal right to have sex, produce children as well as be given a license to drive a deadly weapon, but cannot make their own medical decisions? Smells like hypocrisy to me.

Maybe if she commits a capitol crime, Connecticut would hold her accountable as an adult and no longer use her as their guinea pig? 

The Connecticut Supreme Court needs to reevaluate itself as well as doctors' and hospitals' behavior. The state should only be called in for extreme cases of person or persons who are in need of assistance. Case in point, Child Protective Services should save children from abusive situations, not in cases where the doctors want to override parental consent or decisions, especially for filling their pocketbooks instead of understanding that barbaric allopathic medicine is not the answer to everything. 

Information on alternative medicines is widely available with a plethora of studies and positive outcome cases. One such case happened twenty years ago. He too ran away from chemotherapy, but the action turned into a blessing:

Cancer Boy Ran Away from Chemo 20 Years Ago, 

Is Alive and Well Due to Alternative Solutions 

From the bits and pieces of media coverage since the time Billy ran off, one gets the impression that Billy wound up in California. And from there he discovered cancer-healing protocols for his Hodgkin’s lymphoma. But actually, he never reached California. That was his Greyhound bus destination originally, but he wound up in Houston, TX.

Instead of roaming the streets as many run-away teens do, he was fortunate enough to meet up with fellow skateboarders who helped house him. Billy had no idea of there was a nationwide hunt for his return. His parents had contacted several national news outlets out of concern for his whereabouts and health.

But one day, the father of one of Billy’s skateboarder buddies said he saw Billy on one of the TV shows featuring his runaway from home after five chemo treatments. So Billy decided to return home with one provision: no chemotherapy.

Instead, he would decide on alternative methods. His nationwide exposure had elicited many suggestions from which he could choose.

Billy used 714-X and Essiac tea (recipe) for the same cancer the Connecticut 17-year old has and cured his cancer.

So why is the young woman in Connecticut being forced to take treatments that poison the body instead of using known healing modalities? Money. Power. Control. Diseases of our judicial, medical, and child protective services systems that need to be cured of their hubris with a lawsuit of epic portions when the Connecticut 17-year old turns 18.

There are non-pharmaceutical treatments for cancer, but that would cut into corporate, hospital, doctor, and now state profits. Many such effective treatments are banned in lieu of the more expensive and toxic chemotherapy treatments.

So Connecticut who are you really protecting? A young woman old enough for sex, procreation, and a driver's license? Or the pharmaceutical and hospital industries that do not actually cure anything?

For more information, please read these VDP Gazette articles about Minors and Medical / CPS Crimes by the State: 

Kidnapping by Hospital, Family Ripped Apart for Almost 1 Year 

AZ CPS, Phoenix Children's Hospital Engaged in Child Abduction

Veganism, the New Mental Illness Defined by Arizona's Very Own CPS

AZ Parents Have NO Rights: The Best Interest of Your Child is NOT You According to CPS

These crimes are ongoing throughout America. Won't you make your voices heard?

Also see: How to Take Our Court System Back, isn't it time? 

Additional Note:17 Year old Allowed Mail, writer her,
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Patient Cassandra C
282 Washington Street
Hartford, CT 06106


Source: Age of Consent, Billy Best, Liberty Doll, WVTY,

All Aboard the Crazy Train! More Gun Laws to Cure the Mental Health Crisis in America So The UN Can Strip Us of Our 2nd Amendment Rights

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Second Amendment / Mental Health

______________________________

A federal judge ruled today that Connecticut's new gun laws in reaction to the Sandy Hook massacre were Constitutional.

Alfred V. Covello, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, dismissed all three constitutional challenges in his 47-page decision.

"Obviously, the court cannot foretell how successful the legislation will be in preventing crime," Covello wrote. "Nevertheless, for the purposes of the court's inquiry here, Connecticut, in passing the legislation, has drawn reasonable inferences from substantial evidence."

Yes, actually we can foretell the success of the law. Connecticut's gun control laws before Sandy Hook were very strict. That did not stop what happened and neither will this decision to uphold stricter gun control laws.

Let's illustrate this line of thought. The guns that Adam Lanza used were two semiautomatic handguns and a semiautomatic rifle. All three firearms were purchased legally and registered to his mother, Nancy.

• Carrying a gun onto school property is a felony (U.S. Law)
• Connecticut law prohibits anyone under the age of 21 from owning a gun
• Connecticut also has a "safe storage" provision that makes it a crime if a gun is accessible to a minor
• Rifles and shotguns can be purchased without a permit, after a two-week waiting period
• Handguns, on the other hand, require a permit before either purchasing or carrying them

Yet the laws in Adam Lanza,'s case either didn't apply to the 20 year old or he simply ignored them. The guns were legal. So how does more gun laws restrict access to people with the intent on causing harm?  It simply doesn't.

If you repeat a specific behavior expecting a different outcome, that's called insanity.  Well in societal discourse it may be but the real definition of insanity by the courts is:

Insanity. n. mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.

So explain again how more gun control laws are going to stop someone who cannot distinguish fantasy from reality? It can't. Thus the rationale for upholding this law in District Court is speculative at best and against the Second Amendment at worst.

Of course, the battle over Connecticut's new gun control measures will continue:

New York attorney Brian T. Stapleton, who sued on behalf of the gun owners and other plaintiffs, called the decision disappointing.

"This is a long way from over," he said. "We respect Judge Covello, but respectfully disagree with him. An appeal was anticipated in this case. There are findings that we can work with and we are going to do everything we can to get this overturned."

With the mental health of several mass shooters in question, what is our nation doing to increase mental health care opportunities? Nothing. Instead of helping solve the crisis, we are dismantling our institutions and have been since the 1960's, which has led to the shut down of Mental Health facilities around the nation. Without a pun intended, mental health closures have become an epidemic:

Three Reasons Why Massachusetts’ Push To Shut Down A Mental Hospital Is A Bad Idea

Shutdown forces mental health crisis programs to cut services

Alabama Plans to Close Most Hospitals for Mentally Ill

'Kings Park': Old Mental Asylums Shed Light on Newtown Crisis
Riverside Hospital shuts down mental health clinics

Iowa Lawmakers Call Out GOP Governor For Shutting Down Prison Mental Health Care
Chicago Closing Half Its Mental Health Clinics 

State threatens shutdown of mental health facility

Ronald Reagan: The Bad and the Ugly

CARE to shut its services on Maui

...and the list goes on about Mental Health clinics and hospitals being closed and the patients having nowhere else to turn. 

The article, Seven facts about America’s mental health-care system, had this quote:

By treating the rest in the least-restrictive settings possible, the thinking went, we would protect the civil liberties of the mentally ill and hasten their recoveries. Surely community life was better for mental health than a cold, unfeeling institution.

But in the decades since, the sickest patients have begun turning up in jails and homeless shelters with a frequency that mirrors that of the late 1800s. “We’re protecting civil liberties at the expense of health and safety,” says Doris A. Fuller, the executive director of the Treatment Advocacy Center, a nonprofit group that lobbies for broader involuntary commitment standards. “Deinstitutionalization has gone way too far.”

What was that Rahm Emanuel quote again: "No crisis should go to waste. You never want a serious crisis to go to waste... Things that we had postponed for too long, that were long-term, are now immediate and must be dealt with. This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before."

A variant on the Problem - Reaction - Solution theorem that governments like to employ to cause the people to restrict their own selves through fear, outrage, and mob rule lawmaking.

Enter the United Nations. 

On 2 April 2013, the General Assembly adopted the landmark Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), regulating the international trade in conventional arms, from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. The treaty will foster peace and security by putting a stop to destabilizing arms flows to conflict regions. It will prevent human rights abusers and violators of the law of war from being supplied with arms. And it will help keep warlords, pirates, and gangs from acquiring these deadly tools.

To summarize the United Nations ATT, that means no guns anywhere, held by anyone, but the United Nations' PeaceKeepers. That means you and that means no Second Amendment. That is wrong for our country.

Anyone can easily see where this expectation of "for the common good" rhetoric is going, can't you?

A government wants to disarm it's people without bloodshed, the criminally insane are let loose on the public because there is no place for them to receive mental health care, supposed gun crimes increase, and then the U.N. enters the scene to solve this issue by taking everyone's rights away. 

Just in case you believe gun violence is a paramount problem and out of control in this country, let's review the facts. According to the FBI, the homicides committed in the United States are as follows: 

Weapons	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009
Total	14,965	15,087	14,916	14,224	13,636
Total firearms:	10,158	10,225	10,129	9,528	9,146
Handguns	7,565	7,836	7,398	6,800	6,452
Rifles	445	438	453	380	348
Shotguns	522	490	457	442	418
Other guns	138	107	116	81	94
Firearms, type not stated	1,488	1,354	1,705	1,825	1,834
Knives or cutting instruments	1,920	1,830	1,817	1,888	1,825
Blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.)	608	618	647	603	611
Personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.)1	905	841	869	875	801
Poison	9	12	10	9	6
Explosives	2	1	1	11	2
Fire	125	117	131	85	99
Narcotics	46	48	52	34	45
Drowning	20	12	12	16	8
Strangulation	118	137	134	89	121
Asphyxiation	96	106	109	87	77
Other weapons or weapons not stated	958	1,140	1,005	999	895

So a little over 13K deaths a year from murder, 6K of those are committed with handguns. Sad statistics but true ones. You know what other statistics about death are available? The CDC's Death and Mortality index: 

• Heart disease: 597,689
• Cancer: 574,743
• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 138,080
• Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 129,476
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): 120,859
• Alzheimer's disease: 83,494
• Diabetes: 69,071
• Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 50,476
• Influenza and Pneumonia: 50,097
• Intentional self-harm (suicide): 38,364

Let's balance these statistics with the population of the United States from the Census Bureau: 

	USA
Population, 2013 estimate	316,128,839
Population, 2012 estimate	313,873,685
Population, 2010 (April 1) estimates base	308,747,716

So in the grand scheme of things, murder in America accounts for 13,636 deaths, 9,146 were from firearms of some kind (2009 statistic) but heart disease: kills 597,689 people a year because of our poisoned food, air, and water as well as our bad health care system that relies on symptom control drugs instead of natural and attainable cures.

One last statistic to leave you with: how many guns are legally owned in the United States? Gun Ownership Statistics & Demographics has percentages, but the actual number is 270 to 300 million.

Isn't our murder problem with guns just beyond logic? If hundreds of millions of guns are in the hands of law abiding citizens and less than ten thousand people are murdered by guns, then we have a huge problem, don't you think? In this paragraph the problem is sarcasm. In the real world, it's called over dramatization. You can thank mainstream media for that.

The media plays up the sensationalism of murders and mass murders in this country like no other source except the White House. As well don't forget the reality of violence that mainstream media doesn't tell you: Violence Is A Learned Behavior, Say Researchers At Wake Forest University:

The strong association between exposure to violence and the use of violence by young adolescents illustrates that violence is a learned behavior, according to a new study, published by researchers at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and included in the November issue of the Journal of Pediatrics.

The next time you listen to the news as the anchors dramatize death that violence is a learned behavior and also a viral one. Monkey see; monkey do, especially if you are not getting the mental health care you need.

Or you can go on listening to people like this guy:

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence called the Connecticut suit and similar suits in other states attempts by gun manufacturers to protect market share.

"This suit was not about the Second Amendment," said Brady lawyer John Lowy, who joined the state's defense of the law. "This is about the gun lobby's interest in making guns and selling them to as many people as possible."

John Lowy like many others do not see the forest through the trees. He sees only one course of action instead of taking in account the world around him. Gun control is about the Second Amendment, but it's also about the disgrace that is the American Mental Health System, how governments create crises for their own benefit, and a larger global hijacking of your civil liberties.

You can believe fearmongers like him, or you can listen to reason, look at the facts and statistics, and determine what is best for you and your family without government or mainstream media selling you the party line.

You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/rahmemanue409199.html#PuIxqT5rgyoKSVYW.99

You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/rahmemanue409199.html#PuIxqT5rgyoKSVYW.99

You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/rahmemanue409199.html#PuIxqT5rgyoKSVYW.99

You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/rahmemanue409199.html#PuIxqT5rgyoKSVYW.99

Source: The Courant, PolicyMic, United States District Court District of Connecticut, CGA CT GOV, Politics Daily, ABC News, UNODA, FBI, CDC, US Census Bureau, Huffington Post,