Movie Night: Look Up! Don't Be So Blind

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Geoengineering / Meteorology

___________________________________

There was an interesting post on CBS 5's Facebook page recently. A viewer sent in a photograph of the lines that have been inundating the Phoenix landscape for several years now. These lines are a part of the program known as geoengineering.

A lot of participants are aware of the chemical toxins being sprayed into the sky. Others are so locked into geoengineering is being "discussed" and "researched" that these individuals cannot see the forest through the trees. 

If you can record something on a device like an audio recorder or camera, then what you hear or see is not a hallucination; it is evidence. Do not tell that to some people who are stuck in the "our government would never do that to us" mode. It is very sad to watch indeed. 

Even after challenging naysayers to get a blood test of toxins in their own bodies and compare those results to the geoengineering patents, these individuals cannot even bring themselves to see the challenge through on their own volition. 

An individual was even so bold as to say that the doctors, lawyers, and environmental biologists speaking in front of the Shasta County City Council could not be verified as to their identities. The absurdity continues. According to this viewer, not only are the experts on the video below not who they say they are, but that anyone who has spoken about geoengineering either is not credible, David Lim, or has no credentials to talk at all, Dave Wigington. 

Geoengineering Investigation Demanded By Numerous Experts 

When did we become a communist country in which only credentialed individuals could speak? 

The fact is everyone who does the research, collects evidence and scientific data is credible and credentialed because these people are doing the work. If you do not like a researcher, that is a personal problem. In order to fault the facts, you have to find how the facts were gathered improperly. 

Blood, rain, soil samples go to scientific independent laboratories. Good luck faulting those results. 

Again if you are convinced of geoengineering is a myth, take the test: compare your blood toxins with the patents.

You might be surprised. 

Source: :Dane Wigington

Invisible Contracts, Are You Subject?

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman
Legal / Contract Law
___________________________________

Are the ways laws are written allowing corporations to enslave us in invisible contracts, contracts that are added on to known contracts without public knowledge in order to gain money and power?

Invisible Contracts by George Mercier looks into this phenomenon.

Source: State Citizen

Class vs North Carolina, CASE #11 CV 00 1559

Staff Writer, R.Patrick Chapman
Law / Government
_____________________________________

Class Vs North Carolina, CASE #11 CV 00 1559

3. Public Law 1, 48 stat. 1, refers to H.R 1491 to which the U.S. GOVT. and the
State are the Trustees of the Trust created under this Public Law 1 which placed
all property of the People into the U.S. GOVT and State, and that these
possessions are a “trust “ to be used as a credit line

4. Public Law 10, Chapter 48, 48 stat 112. Refers to H.J.R.192 which removed all
the lawful gold and silver from the State to pay its employees, and for the People
the means to receive pay for sweat equity and pay debt. In 1933 – President
Roosevelt passed HJR 192, June 5, 1933 – and since the government had taken
the gold, and the People had no money, the government would pay the ‘debts’ for
the People, thereby giving them unlimited credit. Whoever has the gold pays the
bills. This legislation states that one cannot demand from you a certain form of
currency, since any form, and all forms of currency are your credit. If they do,
they are in breach of Public Policy, PL 73-10. Not only does this insurance policy
(law) protect the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason, but also it
protects the People from damages caused by the Federal & State governments

5. Under the law of the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, I declare that I am a living
flesh and blood being, and NOT dead, and hold the position of Beneficiary on any
document filed into the Department of Commerce in Washington D.C. on my live
birth for the use of this credit under Public Law 1, 48 stat 1 in reference to H.R
1491.

6. The Court Judge, Defendants and both Attorneys, being educated in the Law of
Commerce, Statute Merchant, and the Laws have knowledge of the Statute at
Large Vol 48 of 1933-1934, pages 1-112, and Title 12 U.S.C., Sec. 95 b and its
reference to Public Law 91, 40 stat 411 of Oct 6 1917 referring to H.R 4960,
Trading With The Enemy Act. They also understand that they are under the title of
Foreign Agent as listed in Title 22, Chapter 11, Sections 611 and 612, and are
unregistered and unlicensed, and are required to be registered as debt collectors to
sell or transfer any unregistered securities.

7. North Carolina Securities Act & Investment Advisors Act, N.C.G.S. 78A and 18
U.S.C., § 1956 US Code - Section 1956: Laundering of monetary instruments
(a)(1) Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction
represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to
conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of
specified unlawful activity -

(A)(i) with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity; or
(ii) with intent to engage in conduct constituting a violation of section 7201 or
7206 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or
(B) knowing that the transaction is designed in whole or in part -
(i) to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the
control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity; or
(ii) to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law,
shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the
property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not
more than twenty years, or both.

8. This Court of Record, the Defendants and both Attorneys, are Public Trustees
and “Debtors in possession” by Oaths of Office under Chapter 11 Reorganization,
and are acting as Trustees to the Bankrupt Estate(s) under P.L. 73-10 , 48 stat 31
of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. The Bankruptcy Act of 1826 placed
the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Comptroller of Currency & the Department of
Agricultural in charge of the 1933 Public Law 10, Chapter 48, 48 stat 112 and
Public Law 1, 48 stat 1, and all property is registered and Titled to the STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA, and the State is required to pay all taxes and all upkeep,
and discharge this debt for the People.

9. The Courts, the Defendants and their Attorneys are using unlawful Tax
Warrants of Attorney as puts and calls to purchase Equity Securities and to steal
this Beneficiary Money using GSA FORMS SF 24 BID BOND, SF 25
PERFORMANCE BOND, and SF 25A PAYMENT BOND and MILLER
REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS 273, 274 and 275.

10. The Courts, the Defendants and both Attorneys are required by the U.S.
PATRIOT ACT to reveal the source of their funds by filing Currency
Transaction Reports, Currency and Monetary Instrument Transportation Forms
(CMIR’s) under §§ 5311 et seq. of 31 U.S.C. of THE BANK SECRECY ACT,
and 31 CFR § 103.11 regulations et seq., under the U.S. PATRIOT ACT and
SEC Rule 17a-8, which applies to all broker-dealers, and incorporates the
requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act to file reports and maintain records
showing the source of the funds.

Source: RayServer

What Happened to the Original Thirteenth Amendment?

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Constitution / Bill of Rights
___________________________________

What? There's another 13th Amendment? So the 13th is actually the 14th Amendment? Hold the phone. 

Amendment XIII
Passed by Congress May 1, 1810 - Ratified December 9, 1812.

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the united States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

Here's a table that outlines the Ratification process for this amendment. 

1	Maryland	December 25, 1810	Ratified
2	Kentucky	January 31, 1811	Ratified
3	Ohio	January 31, 1811	Ratified
4	Delaware	February 2, 1811	Ratified
5	Pennsylvania	February 6, 1811	Ratified
6	New Jersey	February 13,1811	Ratified
7	Vermont	October 24, 1811	Ratified
8	Tennessee	November 21, 1811	Ratified
9	Georgia	November 22, 1811	Ratified
10	North Carolina	December 23, 1811	Ratified
11	Virginia	February 7, 1812	Ratified (Date when Publication of Virginia Laws was approved)
12	Massachusetts	February 27, 1812	Ratified
13	New York	March 12, 1812	Did not Ratify
14	New Hampshire	December 9, 1812	Ratified
15	Connecticut	May 13, 1814	Did not Ratify
16	Rhode Island	September 15, 1814	Did not Ratify
17	South Carolina	December 21, 1814	Tabled the Motion without any action

So why isn't this amendment reflected in our national documents?

There are some excuses and explanations as to why this amendment disappeared after forty years of use. Is there a conspiracy? At this point, who really knows?

The amendment did such:

This Amendment was for the specific purpose of banning participation in government operations by attorneys and bankers who claimed the Title of Nobility of ‘Esquire.’ These people had joined the International Bar Association or the International Bankers Association and owed their allegiance to the King of England.

So make up your own mind. Should Congress reinstate the original Thirteen Amendment? Or should it be cataloged for future reference?

Source: NewsWeek, Constitutional Concepts Foundation,

Villa de Paz, A Community Like No Other, Wins Their Fight

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Community Interest

__________________________________

After a community meeting with Arizona State Senator, Steve Gallardo and District 5 Councilman, Daniel Valenzuela on January 7th, Villa de Paz has again proven that one person, one group of residents can make their voices heard and win. 

As of January 14, 2014, the Phoenix City Planning Commission voted to accepted the withdrawn application from Maple Leaf International Properties. 

To the local west valley newspaper that writes negative articles about Villa de Paz and our Golf Course... um, we WON. Maybe the paper should do balanced stories with interviews with community members and not just corporate lawyers who lost their campaign of destruction. If you are going to be a news outlet for west valley residents, then perhaps you might want to talk to some of them.

Villa de Paz has much more to accomplish in the coming months, but the first hurdle has been reached and crossed successfully. 

Thank you to everyone in our community who has tirelessly worked to bring about this positive outcome. Many individuals donated their time and expertise to fight this invasion. That is the definition of community and team work.

Now, onto the next... working with Bridge Partners to find ways to make this a win-win for all parties involved and reinstitute all of the stipulations Villa de Paz was originally annexed by the City of Phoenix so we can save some Arizona history and wildlife for future generations.

Business Decides $3500 Fine plus for Bad Review

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Consumer Report

________________________________________

When a customer orders and pays for a product they never receive, cannot get in touch with the company's customer service, and goes through Paypal for a transaction reimbursement, a customer is going to complain.

KlearGear.com in it's 2013 website agreement, which the original clause was later removed, wrote as part of the customer's rules states:

"In an effort to ensure fair and honest public feedback, and to prevent the publishing of libelous content in any form, your acceptance of this sales contract prohibits you from taking any action that negatively impacts kleargear.com, its reputation, products, services, management or employees."

Three and half years later, the company is going after a customer for doing the right thing and complaining on RipoffReport.com. The fine for telling the truth is $3500 and the company also turned the couple into all three Credit Bureaus for non-payment for items they never received.

This situation is clearly one of vengeance and blackmail especially grandfathering a customer in over three years later, but the Credit Bureaus aren't seeing the circumstances that way and have ruined the customer's credit.  

Moral of the story: we need better regulations and oversight of the credit agencies and their information as well as to read the user agreement and not to buy from anyone who contracts you into give up your Rights.

I hope the customer gets a lawyer... and sues the pants off everyone involved.

Source: Yahoo!