Gender Ideology and Intellectual Book Burning for Political Correctness

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Transgender / Social Justice
____________________________

In recent Twitter and Facebook posts, the transgender phenomenon has taken on a whole new level of exclusion. Americans should rename gender ideology: gender idealogy. People who believe you do not need societal rules of boy and girl like to hide behind the arbitrary rules of hate speech when someone does not conform to their political correctness. 

The comment that was so awful that people actually reported it for hate has been published here for your consideration:

Transgender is a mental disorder; it is called Gender Dysphoria. For doctors, politicians, and the public to use this small population to run over other people and harm said population is disgusting. I don't support using mental illness to take away the rights of other people. I also do not support using mental illness as a political pawn. I have done research into this phenomenon. That is what it is; it's abuse of the mentally ill. Do some independent research by people who are against abusing people for political and financial gain. I do not support the unprofessional behavior of the medical community to make money on a mental disorder that in most cases would resolve itself over time in a person's life with only a small portion of individuals needing psychiatric support. Transgender individuals are being abused by people supporting a delusion that sets up those individuals to take harmful, carcinogenic chemicals and hormones as well as destructive and unnecessary cosmetic surgeries that will never change the sex of the patient. Do your homework. Do not regurgitate social justice warrior or political correctness. It's mean. It's hateful. It should not be supported by anyone who really cares about individuals with Gender Dysphoria. Stand up to the crowd and save someone's life.

Where was the hate speech? Hateful conduct? Hateful content? 

Nowhere.

People with mental health issues have taken a benign comment and catapulted the statement into the stratosphere of fiction because they were offended by nothing. The paragraph is someone's researched opinion. That cannot be allowed by the gender idealogists. 

For that fact any opinion that counters the gender idealogists' narrative cannot be allowed to exist. That is a problem for our society. That radical, exclusionary stance cripples people's ability to make informed decisions and create educated opinions because the pubic discourse has been parsed down by intellectual book burning. 

In a recent article, 21st Century is the Age of Intellectual Dishonesty, the Editor of the VDP Gazette wrote about how Americans are more interested in believing the lie instead of discovering the reality of the world they live in. 

If you are offended by the above statement, believe it is some form of hate speech/content/conduct, or what have you, then seek some professional help.

You need counseling.


Sources:

• Gender Ideology Harms Children, ACP
• American College of Pediatricians: Gender Ideology Harms Children 
• Gender Dysphoria, the Mental Disorder, and the Child Abuse Promoting this Ideology is the New Sterilization - Population Control Campaign

Who Does the Government Want to Raise Your Children?

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman

Government / Parental Rights 
________________________________

DRAFT POLICY STATEMENT ON FAMILY ENGAGEMENT

FROM THE EARLY YEARS TO THE EARLY GRADES 

PURPOSE 

The purpose of this policy statement is to provide recommendations from the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Education (ED) on systematically engaging families in their children’s development, learning, and wellness, across early childhood and elementary education settings. 

Families are children’s first and most important teachers, advocates, and nurturers. Strong family engagement is central- not supplemental-- to promoting children’s healthy development and wellness, including social-emotional and behavioral development; preparing children for school; seamlessly transitioning them to kindergarten; and supporting academic achievement in elementary school and beyond. Research indicates that families’ engagement in children’s learning and development can impact lifelong health, developmental, and academic outcomes. When families and the institutions where children learn partner in meaningful ways, children have more positive attitudes toward school, stay in school longer, have better attendance, and experience more school success. 

Both Departments recognize the critical role of family engagement in children’s success in the early and elementary education systems. As such, both agencies have developed research-based family engagement frameworks to guide the development of effective family engagement policies and practices: HHS’ Head Start Parent, Family, and Community Engagement Framework and ED’s Dual Capacity Building Framework for Family-School Partnerships. This policy statement identifies common principles from the frameworks that drive effective family engagement across the prenatal to age eight continuum, and inform recommendations to local and State early childhood and elementary education systems. 

It is the position of the Departments that all early childhood programs and schools recognize families as equal partners in improving children’s development, learning and wellness across all settings, and over the course of their children’s developmental and educational experiences. This joint HHS-ED statement aims to advance this goal by: 

1. Reviewing the research base that supports effective family engagement in children’s learning, development, and wellness; 

2. Identifying core principles of effective family engagement practices from HHS’ and ED’s frameworks to drive successful policy and program development; 

3. Providing recommendations to States, LEAs, schools, and community-based early childhood programs to implement effective family engagement; and 

4. Highlighting resources for States, LEAs, schools, and early childhood programs to build capacity to effectively partner with families.

______________________________________________________________________________

1 The term “family” is used to include all the people who play a role in a child’s life and interact with a child’s early childhood program or school. This may include fathers, mothers, grandparents, foster parents, formal and informal guardians, and siblings, among others.

Among others? Do you mean government interference in the raising of someone's child? Identifying core principles is an Agenda 21 principle. So what types of "effective family engagement practices from HHS’ and ED’s frameworks to drive successful policy and program development" are we discussing here?

The agenda to confuse children about their gender and sexuality? Teach kids to masturbate at the age of 9? Or, how about getting the next generation to hate vehicles, carbon, and humans? 

Inquiring minds would like to know.

Be sure to read the draft in its entirety.

Source: DHHS, Dept of Education 

Ending Global Conflict and Religious Violence with Sarah Cochran

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
News / Government
__________________________________

On this interview edition of Buzzsaw, Sean Stone converses about Ending Global Conflict and Religious Violence with Sarah Cochran.

Israeli and Palestinian violence, sectarian Islamic clashes, and mending global conflict are discussed with Sarah Cochran of One Blue. Propaganda that fuels religious turmoil, as well as biased misrepresentations of Islam and how to bridge the gap between people that have been at odds for centuries is discussed, in addition to the concrete steps that can be taken to change the course of hatred–all in this Buzzsaw interview hosted by Sean Stone.

Source: Buzzsaw,