Free Speech is Now Hate Speech

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman
Government / Free Speech 
___________________________________

The European Union is dictating what you can and cannot say or type.

If you disagree with authorities you can have your internet "privileges" suspended or revoked. These internet ghettos have become the permission givers of online speech.

We as a human race with rights, not privileges, cannot have Freedom of Expression when there are administrators filtering our speech and disciplining people for not towing the government line.  

If you are an adult, then why put up with this blatant disrespect? It is high time that the European Union be broken up. The world hoped Scotland would leave, but somehow the votes went the other way. Maybe the people of Europe will finally be free of the bureaucratic dictatorship with a Brexit. 

The people of the world can only hope Europeans step up and dismantle their prison one vote at a time.

CODE OF CONDUCT ON COUNTERING ILLEGAL HATE SPEECH ONLINE

Facebook, Microsoft*, Twitter and YouTube (hereinafter "the IT Companies") – also involved in the EU Internet Forum – share, together with other platforms and social media companies, a collective responsibility and pride in promoting and facilitating freedom of expression throughout the online world;

To read the document in its entirety, please see our source links.

Source: European Union 

Tampons the Ultimate Weapon Against School Micromanagement

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

School Policy / Parental Rights

_________________________________

Really? Principals don't have a better use of their time but make unruly rules? Young women are being forced at school to carry their feminine hygiene products around... in what? Backpacks and purses have been banished from Galesburg High School campus in Illinois. 

“Things like people texting in purses — in class or inappropriate items coming into class and so it wasn’t a single incident, it wasn’t even two or three, it was a combination of all those,” Principal Roy Van Meter stated to the local news affiliate.

Duh, they are kids. When rules are so overbearing, children of that age tend to rebel. How long have you been a school principal anyway? It's psychology 101.

Maybe it's not the students. Perhaps it's the school. 

“She carries her personal feminine napkins in it, hand sanitizing lotion and wipes during her monthly cycle,” the girl’s mother, Carri Harding, told WQAD8 on Wednesday.

Wow! Surprised the poor girl wasn't arrested, but placed in in-house suspension until she gets a doctor's note for her "medical condition." Obviously, it is a directive from someone who has never had a period. 

“Really, a medical condition? I mean, every woman has it every month. It’s not a medical condition, it’s nature,” Harding said in the interview. “I just think that, that particular aspect of their policy should be re-looked at and maybe gone about a different way.”

It's ridiculous. Young women should have access to their necessities during school hours. Their feminine care products are supposed to remain sanitary for good reason. The products should not be lying around in a metal locker or easily lost or stolen from a young lady's pants pocket. 

Women need their privacy. Adults need to get real.

The purse ban is only the latest controversial school rule to hit the headlines. Earlier this month, a Florida school board member proposed a dress code for parents who she claimed dressed too sloppily. “Many parents pick their children up wearing curlers in their hair, sweatpants that fall down, and even pajamas,” board member and creator of the ban Rosalind Osgood told Yahoo Shine. “How can we teach our children to be serious about education if their parents don’t set the right tone?” And last May, according to an upset father on Reddit, his son's unnamed preschool prohibited kids from engaging in "superhero play" to prevent injuries.

Parents, it's time to take your school systems back. 

These people are your employees. You need to start demanding respect for you and your children. No more RFID chips in ID cards. No more school-prison indoctrination. No more drug testing students.

School is there for learning. If your children get bad grades, then you deal with their texting in class. It's not the school's responsibility to police or parent your children; it's a parent's responsibility. 

While you are at putting boundaries on your school officials, take the time to take back your family too.

Or next thing the school bans from campus, maybe you.

Source: Yahoo! News  

Woe to an Empire of Blood, Nuclear Activists Receive Their Sentences

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Government / Activism

______________________________

In the VDP Gazette's article, National Security is a Joke Because There Is Nun, we discussed how Sister Megan Rice, an 83-year-old Catholic nun, with a hammer and some bolt cutters as well as two other aged accomplices broke into a secure nuclear facility called: Y-12 National Security Complex, as known as America's "Fort Knox" of weapons-grade uranium to make a point.

This week their sentences were handed down:  

Federal District Judge Amul R. Thapar sentenced both Greg Boertje-Obed, 58, of Duluth, and Michael Walli, 65, of Washington, DC, to five years and two months in prison (“62 months,” in the parlance of the federal court) plus three years of heavily supervised probation. Sr. Megan Rice, 84, of New York, NY, was sentenced to 35 months in prison plus three years of probation.

The three cohorts will also have to pay a combined total of $52,900 for the cost of repairing the damage they did to the fences and to paint over their slogans.

"Woe to an Empire of Blood."

Sister Megan Rice stated that: "They know that they are the human fallout and the victims of the profiteering by the elite and top leaders of the corporations that are contracted to make the nuclear weapons. It's (the money) denied to human services that should be the priority of any government."

Paul Magno, Rice's friend and an anti-nuclear activist said: "Very frustrating was the fact that the prosecution and the judge worked very hard to avoid paying attention to the (nuclear) weapons factor, the cause of their activism," he said. "And unless our legal institutions will face that, peace activists will continue to take issue with it and invite the government to investigate the war industry."

"Any goverment that would lock up Megan, Michael and Greg is desperate to hide the truth. By their actions, they have broken the silence; their sacrifice challenges each of us to speak up for a safer world," a network of supporters led by Magno and Hutchison, [a supporter of Rice], wrote in a statement.

"The Fruit of Justice is Peace."

"They're supposed to be leaders on something like this. There hasn't been any kind of statement from Catholic bishops on what Megan has done," retired Bishop Thomas Gumbleton, a noted peace activist, told Al Jazeera in an interview in December.

Anyone would expect that the Catholic Church would have sent out a press release either supporting or admonishing the nun's actions. Silence is what Sister Megan Rice received. Perhaps part of the problem of the world is that of an indifferent church to the needs of the people. 

How can there be peace if there is no justice? Did District Court Judge Amul Thapar do his job in creating a fair trial for the defendants or did he make another monkey court of suits on parade?

Ignoring each of the defendant’s direct appeals to the government’s binding legal obligations under the NPT and the Constitution (which holds that treaties are the “Supreme law of the land”) Judge Thapar repeatedly accused the three of showing “complete disrespect for law.”

Judge Thapar’s accusation of “lawlessness” was plainly dishonest and likely designed for the press, especially in view of his pre-trial orders forbidding the defendants from presenting legitimate law-based defenses. The defense of necessity —that unlawful government actions may be interfered with by citizens acting in the spirit of crime prevention —was also disallowed by Judge Thapar, who ruled before trial that the question of whether nuclear weapons production is unlawful was not relevant to the case and would confuse the jury. What the judge did not say was that when juries are allowed to consider evidence of the outlaw status of nuclear weapons, they regularly find protesters not guilty by reason of
justification.

This type of outlandish judicial behavior also shows that National Security isn't about securing anything. It's about the illusion that the United States government has the national security interests of Americans in mind. 

So what is the point? Have you ever wondered why America is the way it is these days? Why judges and lawyers protect this State instead of the People?

There are answers to these questions and no American is going to like what they hear, but it's about time we set aside our differences and embrace the fact that the United States, Inc. is not our country. It's our prison.

We all might as we have committed lawlessness because we are paying a price for it anyway.

Source: Global Research, AlJazeera America,