Showing posts with label tax payers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tax payers. Show all posts

Monday, January 16, 2017

Congressional Research Office's Medicaid: An Overview

Staff Writer, DL Mulla
Research / Statistics 
________________________________


Summary
Medicaid is a means-tested entitlement program that in FY2012 financed the delivery of primary and acute medical services as well as long-term services and supports to an estimated 57 million people, and cost states and the federal government $431 billion. In comparison, the Medicare program provided health care benefits to nearly 50 million seniors and certain individuals with disabilities in FY2012 at a cost of roughly $557 billion. Because Medicaid represents a large component of federal mandatory spending, Congress is likely to continue its oversight of Medicaid's eligibility, benefits, and costs.
Participation in Medicaid is voluntary for states, though all states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories choose to participate. In order to participate in Medicaid, the federal government requires states to cover certain mandatory populations and benefits, but the federal government also allows states to cover other optional populations and services. Due to this flexibility, there is substantial variation among the states in terms of factors such as Medicaid eligibility, covered benefits, and provider payment rates. In addition, there are several waiver and demonstration authorities that allow states to operate their Medicaid program outside of federal rules.
Historically, Medicaid eligibility has generally been limited to low-income children, pregnant women, parents of dependent children, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities; however, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148, as amended) included the ACA Medicaid expansion, which expands Medicaid eligibility to individuals under the age of 65 with income up to 133% of the federal poverty level (FPL) (effectively 138% FPL) at state option.
The ACA makes a number of other changes, which together represent the most significant reform to the Medicaid program since its establishment in 1965. In addition to the ACA Medicaid expansion, the ACA also expands Medicaid eligibility for children ages 6 to 18 and former foster care children; transitions to the modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) counting methodology for most nonelderly Medicaid enrollees; requires alternative benefit plan (ABP) coverage for certain Medicaid enrollees; provides enhanced federal matching funds for the ACA Medicaid expansion; increases uniformity among Medicare, Medicaid, and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) program integrity activities; and provides the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) with the ability to test methods to improve coordination of care for dual-eligible beneficiaries, among a number of other changes.
This report describes the basic elements of Medicaid, focusing on who is eligible, what services are covered, how enrollees share in the cost of care, how the program is financed, and how providers are paid. The report also explains waivers, program integrity activities, and the dual-eligible population. In addition, the report describes the following selected issues: the ACA Medicaid expansion, the impact of the ACA health insurance annual fee on Medicaid, and the ACA maintenance of effort (MOE) with respect to Medicaid eligibility.


Source; FAS

Thursday, October 29, 2015

ADOT Progresses on Agenda 21

Staff Writer, R. Patrick Chapman
Light Rail / Agenda 21
_________________________________

With or without voter consent, the Department of Transportation is moving forward with plans to expand light rail to Tucson from Phoenix.

The economy is weak and growing at a small pace. There is no room to be demanding the tax payer to foot the bill for another government waste. Phoenix tax payers voted in more light rail and now ADOT wants more!

Public hearings were already held back in September. Not like regional boards or committees want your input anyway.

If you still want to voice your opinion, the deadline for all public comments is Oct. 30 and you can submit comments by emailing projects@azdot.gov.

Source: Fox News

Monday, August 24, 2015

Phoenix Voting: If You Don't Know, Vote: NO

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Voting / City of Phoenix / Opinion
___________________________________

With the summer voting season upon us, Phoenix City residents are being asked to vote on measures they know little to noting about. Our advice: if you don't know, Vote: NO!

The VDP Gazette over the years has made it our mission to inform residents about Agenda 21 and other underhanded schemes imposed on us by our Mayor and City Council members. Take for instance, Proposition 100. That seems innocuous enough. Vote on the City of Phoenix's general plan. 

Have you seen the General Plan? Were you ever notified about changing the General Plan? I have not. I have not heard one word about how the City of Phoenix planners would like to waste money on Urban high rise lifestyles, lightrail, or "sustainability." 

Do not get us started on Proposition 104, the $31 Billion tax revenue scheme to pay for light rail! 

City of Phoenix workers are still on furloughs. Employees are not even making their own base salary, but we can waste money on trains that go nowhere.

As some residents have pointed out, we have a deficit in the number of police officers for the safety of our streets. 

Didn't Phoenix just shut down a school because of financial problems?

So no school, no police, no employee full time work hours, but we can pass U.N. climate policies to degrade our streets, living standards, and housing developments. 

Sounds like our Mayor and City Council members need to focus on Phoenix first or be voted out of office. What do you think?

So if you come to a Proposition and are not sure what to do: Vote: NO. Phoenix cannot afford to follow other cities into debt and poverty over politically motivated money schemes for U.N. officials.

Thank you.