In the Now: How Corporate Media Monopolizes the Airwaves

Staff Writer, DB Holmes

Media / Propaganda
_____________________________________

RT"s In the Now talks with Ben Swann about the U.S. State Department's accusations against Russia Today and how media has a stranglehold on America for purposes of controlling information and government propaganda.

In the Now, Episode 3

Anissa Naouai repels attacks on RT by US State Department and looks at how US corporate media functions - award-winning journalist Ben Swann joins the discussion. Plus, why whistleblowers are persecuted instead of wrongdoers - we ask a whistleblower "In the Now".

Ben Swann adds:

“Those executives are becoming so entwined in a crony system with politicians, that it really has become a form of propaganda. Where on the local level and in the newsroom level, journalists don’t really have a say. They are not allowed to talk about certain issues in this country. We are not allowed to show certain pictures. I just had a conversation with someone today, I asked them, ‘When was the last time in the United States that we saw a picture on national or local television of the aftermath of a U.S. drone strike?’ And they couldn’t tell me. The reason for that is because we don’t show those pictures here. American media refuses to show those images.”

Source: RT,  Ben Swann

The Truth In Media Project and Humanity Over Politics with Ben Swann

Staff Writer, DLMullan

News / Interview
_____________________________________

The Truth In Media Project and Humanity Over Politics with Ben Swann

The Truth In Media Project and the idea of humanity over politics is discussed with journalist Ben Swann. The role of new media vs. mainstream media in seeking out and reporting the truth about our government is looked at with Swann in this Buzzsaw interview hosted by Tyrel Ventura.

Source: Buzzsaw

Vaccines: the Government, Media, Pharmaceutical Coverup

Staff Writer, DL Mullan

Parental Rights / Medicine

____________________________________

What if... many parents struggle with this question every time they look at their autistic child. What if... vaccines harmed my child? What if... vaccines caused my child's brain damage? In some cases: What if... vaccines killed my child?

Government and mainstream media have long held that there is no scientific study that links vaccines with any undesirable outcomes. What if... that was not true?

In this report by Ben Swann: Truth in Media: Vaccine Court and Autism, we find that legal jargon and media's suppression may be the government's propaganda machine employed into coercing parents to use vaccines without relating the facts of any negative consequences.

Shouldn't everyone be informed of the facts before implementation of a medical procedure? Obviously, this strategy is not one the government, mainstream media, or the pharmaceutical companies want. Then you have to ask yourself: what if? because no one in the know is going to tell you the truth. 

Be active. Be informed. Look beyond what someone in the medical field, government, or pharmaceutical industry is going to tell you, because these people/entities are not subject to informing anyone of anything. And they are not held to the legal standards of liability.

Isn't time this conduct changed? What if... it was your child?