Mandating a Vaccine with an Unknown Biological Agent is Against International Law

Editor, DL Mullan
COVID / Mandates / Unlawful
_____________________________

The Biden Administration has violated international law by dictating medical policy to our military, troops and Veterans. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 scare, China, the UN, WHO, CDC, NIH, media, and politicians have argued that the virus had a natural variation that jumped to human transmissibility. When in reality, COVID-19 is a laboratory created biological agent and of this writing is a weapon of unknown origin. 

So how can any government on the Earth demand the manufacture and mandate of a COVID-19 vaccine without being in direct conflict with international law?

For example:  

Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare

The 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibits the use of chemical and biological weapons in war. The Protocol was drawn up and signed at a conference which was held in Geneva under the auspices of the League of Nations from 4 May to 17 June 1925, and it entered into force on 8 February 1928.

 

Biological Weapons Convention 1972

States Parties to the Biological Weapons Convention undertook “never in any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain:

1. microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes;
2. weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.”

For reference, viruses were added to the definition of biological agent in 1969.

 

United States' State Department

The adherence to these conventions is on the United States' own State Department's website:

The core obligations of Parties under the Convention are

• Never to develop, produce, stockpile, or otherwise acquire or retain: 1) biological agents or toxins of types and in quantities that have no justification for peaceful uses; and 2) weapons, equipment, or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes (Article I).
• To destroy or divert to peaceful purposes all agents, toxins, weapons, equipment, and means of delivery specified in Article I in their possession, or under their jurisdiction or control (Article II).
• Not to transfer or in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any entity to manufacture or otherwise acquire any of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment or means of delivery specified in Article I (Article III).
• To take any necessary measures to prohibit and prevent the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition, or retention of any of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment, and means of delivery specified in Article I under its jurisdiction or control (Article IV).

When a biological agent comes from a weapons laboratory and created via gain of function technology, the resultant virus or bacteria needs to be defined, catalogued, and tested under strict scientific protocols not to mention the law, its rules and regulations.

China destroyed its early samples of the pandemic-creating COVID-19 virus, has denied access to the Wuhan lab to investigators, and has been complicit with creating biological weapons in their laboratories as a means of warfare:

• China confirms US accusations that it destroyed early samples of the novel coronavirus, but says it was done for 'biosafety reasons'.
• Chinese scientists destroyed proof of virus in December
• China deliberately destroyed evidence about start of coronavirus, report says
• China denies entry to WHO team sent to investigate coronavirus origin

So again how can any government or corporate entity demand the use of vaccines when the nature of the viral outbreak is still yet undetermined? How is it allowable to create bioweapons in the form of vaccines when the originating viral samples are lost to the ages?

Just what are the vaccines comprised of that would not violate international law? 

Why are state actors and agencies trying so hard to circumvent international law by arguing that the COVID-19 viral agent is not from a weapons laboratory, specifically from Wuhan, China? 

Governments demanding the manufacture, sale, distribution, and use of a weaponized viral strain of the coronavirus would be permissible under international treaties' legitimate peaceful purposes, including developing medicines and vaccines to counter natural or deliberate disease outbreaks, however when states demand or mandate such counter measures for corporate and state agency profits, governments have crossed the line between peaceful purposes into nefarious means. 

Especially when the international community, media, government agencies and politicians keep hidden the origination of viral outbreak, the virus itself, any and all means of treatments that are not associated with corporate profit via vaccine mandates.

Treatments that are cost and biologically effective against COVID-19 have been disputed and regulated to the "conspiracy theory" deflection in order to promote the fallacy that no other legitimate means of countering the virus exists. This denial of medical science allows for governments to fast-track vaccine production for state agency and corporate profit creation. When this happened at the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, millions of people around the world succumbed to the virus and still are because they are being denied access to remedies that would have saved their lives such as: 

• The Zelenko Protocol, Frontline Doctors
  
• Hydroxychloroquine 
• 5000 IU of Vitamin D3 along with other anti-viral vitamins, all of which are listed in the NIH's database as mitigating infection and spread.  
  

Even when the National Institutes of Health's own studies verified the hydroxychloroquine, Zelenko treatments back in 2005:

• Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

Emergency Use Authorization, or EUAs, are dependent on the sole fact that no other successful therapeutic treatment, exists. 

We should stick to the facts: 

• COVID-19 is a biological weapon. 
• COVID-19 has the status of an unknown origination. 
• COVID-19 has several treatments available for use by the public that is successful in reducing spread and the mortality rate. 
• COVID-19 does not need a vaccine. 
• COVID-19 vaccines do not fit within the guidelines for EUA status from the FDA.
  

So the Biden Administration has no legal footing to demand our troops, Veterans, or any American corporation, citizen be forced to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

Until the original samples, origination, and understanding of the virus is complete, then the governments around the world should honor the Geneva Protocol and other treaties like the Biological Weapons Convention in dealing with the COVID-19 virus. 

Vaccines can only be given priority if there are no other therapeutics available, which in the case of COVID-19 successful protocols to treat this virus are readily accessible.  

This article alone dispels the need for vaccines, mandates, and advises that governments honor their commitments to biological weapons treaties and end their unlawful vaccine mandates and passports.

Sources: United Nations Geneva Protocol, United Nations Biological Weapons Convention, United States' State Department, Business Insider, MSN, The Times,  NIH, C19HCQ, Zelenko,

 

 

How The Flu Vaccine is Bad Medicine

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Influenza / Vaccine Mandates 

 ___________________________________

The Flu Vaccine is Bad Medicine

As a physician and former editor of the medical journal, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, I know something about immunology, inflammation, and vaccines. For more than 15 years I’ve studied and researched the science and pseudoscience underlying the U.S. vaccine program. What I’ve found is that the science is irresponsibly poor. However, because the industry stakeholders are more powerful and wealthier than any other industry in the history of the world, they have been extremely successful at using deceptive marketing to promote bad, ineffective, untested, and unsafe vaccines.

I also know the difference between real, honest, independent, transparent science, and the fake, dishonest, financially biased/bought-and-paid-for pseudoscience being pumped into medical journals by the pharmaceutical industry and their physician co-conspirators. Nowhere is the scientific fraud and betrayal of public trust more manifest than in the promotion of untested and unsafe vaccines, not the least of which is the flu vaccine.

Unlike many of my vaccine administering and profiting physician colleagues, I have no financial interests, biases, or delusions regarding vaccinations. Therefore, I have no motivation to misrepresent the facts, ignore or deny the risks, fail to fulfill the legal and ethical requirement of informed consent, fear-monger and bully patients into receiving a medical intervention from which I personally profit. Furthermore, unlike my indoctrinated colleagues that have never read beyond the sales brochures that accompany the delicious free lunches delivered by their charming and attractive pharmaceutical representatives, I don’t arrive at my conclusions and base my medical recommendations on industry sponsored pseudoscience. I actually work hard to find and analyze high-quality independent science. After having spent years analyzing the science of the flu vaccine, the only conclusion that I or any reasonable, open minded, free-thinking physician can come to is that the flu vaccine is bad medicine.

Unfortunately, the public is being heavily marketed poor science and egregious lies carefully contrived to mislead the public into believing that the flu vaccine is “the best defense against the flu,” is good medicine, and that this drivel is based on solid science. However, systematic reviews, like that from the Cochrane Collaboration (here and below), say that the flu vaccine scientific research is heavily influenced by industry. Yet, despite the best efforts of industry to mislead us into believing otherwise, the Cochrane meta-analysis of 72 plus research studies conclude that the flu vaccine is neither effective nor recommended. I agree with the Cochrane Collaboratives expert and unbiased conclusions and add that in my opinion, the flu vaccine is really bad medicine.

At best, the flu vaccine has been less than 50% effective, most years less than 20% effective against influenza A and B, which represent about 10% of the circulating viruses responsible for causing cold and flu like symptoms.

The bottom line is that the flu vaccine is neither good medicine nor good science. It is, however, big money, and that is the primary driver behind the annual drive to increase uptake of the bad medicine we call the “flu shot.”

Read the rest for an overall understanding... link in the source.


Source: Jim Meehan, MD