Is Gender Ideology Lewd and Lascivious Behavior?

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Gender Fluidity / Obscenity Laws

____________________________

In today's electric climate of biology and gender, a sociological theory on how and what people are is a controversial one. Are you nature or nurture? Biology or psychology? Are we a product of our genetics or are we at the mercy of our own illusion? 

Is there male and female? Or, is the human race bound by gender ideology: I am what I feel?

Social justice advocates, activists, and warriors will yell and scream about exploring our own sexuality even in the classroom. However, is this discussion of our sexual identities considered in the realm of the legal definition of obscenity?

1712, Massachusetts made it criminal to publish "any filthy, obscene, or profane song, pamphlet, libel or mock sermon" in imitation or mimicking of religious services. Acts and Laws of the Province of Mass. Bay, c. CV, § 8 (1712), Mass.Bay Colony Charters & Laws 399 (1814). Thus, profanity and obscenity were related offenses.

In light of this history, it is apparent that the unconditional phrasing of the First Amendment was not intended to protect every utterance. This phrasing did not prevent this Court from concluding that libelous utterances are not within the area of constitutionally protected speech. Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250, 266. At the time of the adoption of the First Amendment, obscenity law was not as fully developed as libel law, but there is sufficiently contemporaneous evidence to show that obscenity, too, was outside the protection intended for speech and press.

So when does teaching about biology and psychology step into obscenity?

See also Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n, 236 U.S. 230, 242, where this Court said as to motion pictures:

. . . They take their attraction from the general interest, eager and wholesome it may be, in their subjects, but a prurient interest may be excited and appealed to. . . .

(Emphasis added.)

We perceive no significant difference between the meaning of obscenity developed in the case law and the definition of the A.L.I., Model Penal Code, § 207.10(2) (Tent.Draft No. 6, 1957), viz.:

. . . A thing is obscene if, considered as a whole, its predominant appeal is to prurient interest, i.e., a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion, and if it goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in description or representation of such matters. . . .

Hasn't Gender Ideology gone from wholesome to the appeal to the morbid interest in nudity and sex?

We have children being taught that their bodies do not conform to their personalities. Children are being placed on harmful drugs, their minds twisted into delusion, and their sexual identities, nude construction used as political fodder all for the prurient interest for excitement and appeal to adults. Children are being taught sexuality beyond the customary limits of candor.

Meanwhile in Arizona:

Arizona Revised Statutes 13-1402 states that indecent exposure is committed whenever a person exposes recklessly either genitals or their anal region or in the case of women – areolas and nipples in front of another individual without considerations about a witness getting either alarmed or offended by the act.

Breast-feeding is, needless to say, excluded from the statute.

As far as the seriousness of the offense is concerned, people who commit indecent exposure in front of individuals aged 15 or younger should expect more serious penalties. Typically, indecent exposure is classified as a misdemeanor but if there are aggravating circumstances, a person may eventually be charged with a Class 3 felony.

On top of the state-wide regulations, Arizona cities may have individual local indecent exposure laws to target such behavior. Downtown Scottsdale, for example, has fines imposed on individuals found guilty of urinating in public. In Bullhead City, a person found guilty of solicitation by indecent exposure faces Class 3 misdemeanor charges.

Keep in mind that indecent exposure is different from engaging in a public sex act. Public sexual indecency is defined in Arizona Revised Statutes 13-1403 and the severity of the sanctions will once again depend on previous offenses and whether the act took place in front of a minor.

So what would be considered indecent exposure? When a grown man walks into a Target woman's bathroom and exposes his genitalia to a minor female child? 

What would be considered indecent exposure? A grown man going into a woman's gym shower and changing area, getting naked in front of women, and then going for a workout?

There are serious concerns and legal questions about the limits of Gender Ideology when it comes to Indecent Exposure and Obscenity, not to mention Women's Rights and sexual privacy rights of other individuals.

In recent court cases, judges have dismissed the legitimate concerns over sexual privacy and the rights of other individuals to push Gender Ideology. These same courts and judges illegitimately place people's "feelings" over established laws pertaining to obscenity, lewd conduct, and indecent exposure. These social justice judges should be investigated for their unethical standards when laws are ignored for political correctness. 

Should belief be used instead of established biological science? Should judges be allowed to redefine the sexes based on psychology, which goes against Title IX?

What are people teaching your children at school when you are at work?

Source: Cornell Law,  AZ Criminal Defense Group  

Corporate Agenda to Erode Women's Rights through Social Justice's Inclusion

Staff Writer, DL Mullan
Sex Crimes / Children

______________________________________

The debate over unisex bathrooms continues. Many people are still signing the Sign the Boycott Target Pledge! and with good reason.

Statistics on pedophilia:

-Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

-Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).

So males of the species in most cases are predominately the offender in sex crimes against children. 2/3 of these men will target little girls.

If transgender individuals just need to pee, then why aren't they using the restrooms that correspond to their biological needs instead of attacking women's rights?

Simply because this issue isn't about equality, it's about Social Justice. Social Justice was created by the United Nations to disrupt cultures and skew facts by making every issue an emotional explosion of "in your face" mind manipulation.

Nothing is black and white except what can be proven in accepted science literature. I took child psychology at the university level. For one, there was no discourse, no test, no essay to learn about transgender. This subgroup was not even a mention several years ago, but it's headline making, law enforceable, news now?

Social Justice is UN Agenda 21.

Back to our other facts... girls are stalked and molested and raped at a much higher rate than boys by men...

-A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male."[3]

-A study in the Journal of Sex Research states that "pedophilia does not exist, or is extremely rare, in women."[4]

Out of the 320 or so million Americans, 162 million are women. 157 million are men. Only 700,000 consider themselves transgender.

The estimated number of child sexual offenders is about 4% of the total male population. that translates to 6,280,000 potential pedophiles, etc in the American population. 4,144,800 of those men- go after girls.

As a result, almost all research on pedophiles is based on convicted sex offenders—those who have already acted on their desires—most of whom are or have been in prison. As Judith Herman, a psychologist who works with abused children at the Victims of Violence clinic in Boston told The Daily Beast in an e-mail: “Truthfully, I don't think the psychiatric profession has much of a clue about pedophiles. Most studies are based on…the 5 percent who get caught—a very unrepresentative group.” In other words, most pedophilia research subjects are outliers.

So the transgender bathroom issue is simple. use the bathroom that corresponds to your XX or XY, or related post-op. Do not argue with me about allowing men in the little girls room. I have too many facts to be persuaded by nonsense.

Does someone want to argue the rape epidemic with me next? Nearly 300,000 women get raped a year.

Yes, let's let men into our bathrooms. what could possibly go wrong? Women fought in court to have separate bathrooms from men. Read Title 9 on why separate rooms are mandated for educational institutions who accept funding from the government. You will read sexual exploitation as one of those concerns.

People who push propaganda and the UN's Social Justice nonsense do not have any facts, have not read history, and are not informed individuals. When you allow men into the women's bathrooms, you just do not allow transgenders in, you allow over 4 million sexual predators in there too.

And, transgenders have a higher instance of going to prison than the general population. That is a fact. Another fact is that specific statistics on transgenders do not exist, so how would anyone know if transgenders have or have not committed any sex crimes against women or children? 

Companies and large corporations who sign on to the Globalist agenda like Social Justice, Agenda 21, and economic trade "Unions" do not care about the LGBT community. These entities are out to cause havoc in order to push through the TPP, TIPP. More rules and regulations to keep people in poverty and social disarray.

I supported the LGBT community with their rights initiatives only to have been betrayed by them. The companies who support men in bathrooms, I am slowly changing my buying habits to stop paying women-hating CEO's from giving my rights and safety over to men. 

I hope others will wake up to the deception. 

The transgender issue is a corporate take over of women's rights and to exploit our children. 

 Sources: Child Molestation and Research, CMR, The Daily Beast, RAINN, Infoplease,